Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human without reason or legitimate argument, particularly the unlawful killing of another human with hatred in mind.
How is a homicide defined?Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of another human without reason or legitimate argument, particularly the unlawful killing of another human with hatred in mind.
Depending on the region, this state of thought may differentiate murder from other types of unlawful homicide, such as manslaughter. Manslaughter is defined as murdering done without malice[note 1] and caused by reasonable provocation or reduced ability. Where it is acknowledged, involuntary manslaughter is a shooting that lacks all but the most diluted guilty purpose and carelessness.
Learn more about unlawful killing
https://brainly.com/question/28460818
#SPJ1
What is racial profiling in law enforcement, and what are some of the methods that have been prescribed to stop it?
Answer:
Racial profiling refers to the process by which law enforce- ment relies on generalizations based on race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin, rather than objective evidence or individual behaviour, to subject people to stops, detailed searches, identity checks and investiga- tions
List and explain the two reasons the American criminal justice system is a non-system.
Answer:
This article discusses contemporary criticism of the present criminal justice system, which has been labeled a "nonsystem" since its three primary components—law enforcement, courts, and correction—are frequently mismanaged and inefficient.
Explanation:
Brainliest, Please!
Which historical events have caused American authorities to want to surveil persons?
There may be more than one correct answer. Be sure to select all that apply.
What are some arguments in favor of and opposing the reduction of police discretion?
Answer:
Arguments supporting and opposing the acceptance of gratuities and benefits A. Arguments in support of acceptance Appreciation Natural and reasonable to show appreciation to those providing a public service. Rude to refuse. Not significant Gratuities are not significant enough to buy or cultivate favour.
Compare the average kinetic energy of molecules of a cold solution to the average kinetic energy of molecules in a warm solution.
Answer:
Explanation: giải phương trình
{2x + 3y=0
4x -3y=0
The average kinetic energy of molecules in a cold solution is lower than the average kinetic energy of molecules in a warm solution. This is because the temperature of a solution is a measure of the average kinetic energy of the molecules in the solution.
The average kinetic energy of the molecules in a solution increases along with the increase in temperature.
A molecule's kinetic energy is the energy it has as a result of motion. Joules (J) are used to measure it. The average kinetic energy of a collection of molecules is calculated by multiplying the total kinetic energy by the total number of molecules in the collection.
A molecule's temperature has a direct relationship with its kinetic energy. This implies that a molecule's kinetic energy grows along with its temperature. Kinetic energy and temperature are related by the following equation: KE = 3/2kT
where KE is the molecule's kinetic energy, k is Boltzmann's constant, and T is the molecule's temperature.
Because the molecules in a cold solution have low temperatures, they also have low average kinetic energies. Since the molecules in a heated solution have high temperatures, they also have high average kinetic energies.
To know more about kinetic energy:
https://brainly.com/question/999862
#SPJ2
Ikemba is a Marine judge advocate defending three enlisted Marines from the charge of having abused enemy
combatants captured in a recent raid on a terrorist camp. What area of law does Ikemba's case involve?
O
administrative
O
international
O
operations
O
criminal
Answer:
The answer to your question would be "criminal".
Explain the doctrine of legal guilt.
Answer:
Legal culpability relates to whether the prosecutor can establish beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the crime. Whether you committed the crime or not, you are not legally guilty unless the prosecution has enough evidence to convict you beyond a reasonable doubt in front of a court or jury.
Explanation:
Brainliset Please!
A summary court martial tries enlisted personnel for smaller, noncapital crimes.
O
True
O
False
The textbook names four generalizations about American law enforcement. Identify those four generalizations.
Answer:
Law enforcement agencies at the federal, state, county, and municipal levels. Federal law enforcement agencies, which are officially part of the executive branch of the United States government, are separate from other law enforcement agencies as well as legislative and judicial bodies.
Explanation:
Brainliest Please!
Fruit Tree Negligence. Mr. Mattingly, a farmer, has a legal right to apply pesticides to his fruit trees. One year, he decided to hire a crop-dusting airplane to spread a pesticide on his orchard. An unexpected gust of wind blew the chemical onto a neighbor's beehives, killing all the bees, The neighbor sued Mattingly for the value of the 60 beehives. Mattingly argued that a good fruit farmer has to apply pesticides and that the crop duster had exercised extreme caution in applying the chemical.
1. Was Mr. Mattingly negligent? Should strict liability apply to this case?
2. How should Mr. Mattingly defend this case? Explain.
3. How would you decide this case? Explain your answer.
Yes, Mr. Mattingly was negligent. Although he had a legal right to apply pesticides to his fruit trees, he also had a duty to do so in a manner that did not cause harm to his neighbors.
Mr. Mattingly could defend this case by arguing that he acted with reasonable care in hiring a crop-dusting airplane to apply the pesticide and that the unexpected gust of wind was an unforeseeable event that he could not have prevented.
In deciding this case, the court would need to consider whether Mr. Mattingly breached his duty to take reasonable care to prevent harm to his neighbor's property.
What is Negligence?Negligence is a legal concept that refers to the failure of an individual or entity to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person or property. To establish negligence, a plaintiff must prove four elements:
Duty: The defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff;Breach: The defendant breached that duty of care by failing to act with reasonable care or skill;Causation: The defendant's breach of duty caused harm or injury to the plaintiff; andDamages: The plaintiff suffered actual damages as a result of the harm or injury.In other words, negligence occurs when someone fails to take reasonable care to prevent harm to others, and that failure results in harm or injury. Negligence is a common legal concept in many areas of law, including personal injury, medical malpractice, and product liability.
Learn more about negligence here: https://brainly.com/question/30867929
#SPJ1
Geographic Location of the Mass Prison Era
Answer:In recent history, the rapid increase in incarceration started with the tough-on-crime, law-and-order, war-on-drugs policies initiated by President Nixon and established by President Reagan. Presidents Bush and Clinton continued those policies and exacerbated them with Clinton's 1994 crime bill.
Explanation:
In recent history, the rapid increase in incarceration started with the tough-on-crime, law-and-order, war-on-drugs policies initiated by President Nixon and established by President Reagan. Presidents Bush and Clinton continued those policies and exacerbated them with Clinton's 1994 crime bill.
Please provide an example of each stage of Lawrence Kohlberg's Moral Development Theory in either a single event or separate events for each stage in your scenario (which may be factual or fictional);
1.) Pre-conventional
2.) Conventional
3.) Post-conventional
Since the Gideon v. Wainwright legacy guaranteed the right to legal representation, all public defenders are ethically bound to be independent and take no direction from the government. How did this decision create equity in the legal system?
The Gideon v. Wainwright decision created equity in the legal system by ensuring that all defendants, regardless of their financial status, have the right to legal representation.
Prior to this decision, only those who could afford an attorney had access to legal representation, leaving many indigent defendants to represent themselves in court. This led to a significant disadvantage for those defendants and often resulted in unjust outcomes. By guaranteeing the right to legal representation, the decision ensured that all defendants would have access to a trained legal advocate who could help ensure their laws were protected and provide them with a fair trial. Public defenders, who are ethically bound to be independent and take no direction from the government, were established to provide legal representation to those who could not afford to hire an attorney. This has helped level the playing field and created greater equity in the legal system by ensuring that all defendants have access to competent legal representation.
Learn more about laws :
https://brainly.com/question/30704261
#SPJ1
In the context of strategies used in drug enforcement in the US, explain crop eradication and the problems associated with its implementation.
Answer:
Manual eradication or aerial spraying of a herbicide combination, the major element of which is glyphosate, is used to eliminate drug crops in the United States under the trade name Roundup®. Eradication can be carried out freely or involuntarily by growers.
Explanation:
Brainliest, please!
Explain how the three I’s of police selection (intelligence, integrity, and interaction skills) relate to the success of a police officer.
Answer:
Under Integrity, the text mentions that police should have a lifestyle that allowsthem to stay honest. Do you think that the salaries that police earn are enough toallow a comfortable lifestyle? Why or why not?•Under Interaction Skills, the text states that police should get along with peopleof diverse backgrounds. This includes not just racial minorities, but also women,people from different income levels, children, and the elderly. In general, why doyou think the breakdown in communication occurs when it does
State two risks and two benefits from the collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military. In a summary sentence, show a way for the U.S. government and its citizens to live with the risks.
Answer:
Two risks of collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military include a lack of accountability and potential conflicts of interest. Private military services may prioritize profits over the safety and well-being of U.S. military personnel and civilians, leading to unethical or even illegal actions.
Two benefits of collaboration between private military services and the U.S. military include access to specialized expertise and technology, as well as the ability to supplement and support the U.S. military in times of need.
To live with the risks, the U.S. government can implement regulations and oversight to ensure that private military services are held accountable for their actions and prioritize the safety and well-being of U.S. military personnel and civilians. Additionally, the government can work to increase transparency and limit conflicts of interest to prevent private military services from putting profits ahead of ethical considerations.
CAN YOU IDENTIFY ANY BIASES THIS AUTHOR MIGHT HAVE?
These 3 Common Arguments For Preserving the Electoral College Are Wrong from TIME Magazine
Why We Need the Electoral College from Real Clear Politics
This proposal calls for popular vote to determine the winner from PBS NewsHour
Answer:
cannot speculate on the personal biases of any author as it would require knowledge about their thoughts, beliefs, and values, which I do not possess. However, I can say that each of these articles presents a different perspective on the Electoral College and its role in American politics. It is up to the reader to critically evaluate the arguments presented and consider any potential biases or assumptions underlying them.
SCENARIO TWO FACTS: Potter is a professional jockey who has been riding in horse races for ten years. Just after he left the starting gate, Potter's horse veered away from another horse approaching on his right and stumbled on a clod of dirt in the racetrack. Potter fell and injured his back. Potter sued the racetrack owners for failure to use due care in maintaining the racetrack.
1. Explain what, if any, responsibility each party has regarding the injuries sustained from the attack. Plaintiff Defendant
2. What, if any, claim does the plaintiff have? Explain
3. What, if any, affirmative defense does the defense have?Explain
The plaintiff is Potter, the professional jockey who was riding in the horse race and got injured. The defendant is the racetrack owners, who are responsible for maintaining the racetrack.
What is the responsibility each party has?1. In this scenario, the plaintiff is Potter, the professional jockey who was riding in the horse race and got injured. The defendant is the racetrack owners, who are responsible for maintaining the racetrack.
The plaintiff may argue that the defendant had a duty of care to ensure that the racetrack was safe for the horses and jockeys to ride on. The defendant, on the other hand, may argue that they took all reasonable measures to maintain the racetrack, and the plaintiff's injuries were caused by the horse's behavior.
2. The plaintiff may have a claim for negligence against the defendant. Negligence is a legal theory that holds individuals or organizations responsible for the harm they cause as a result of their failure to take reasonable care to prevent that harm.
In this case, the plaintiff may argue that the defendant failed to use due care in maintaining the racetrack, which led to the plaintiff's injuries. To succeed in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care, breached that duty, and that the breach caused the plaintiff's injuries.
3. The defendant may have an affirmative defense of assumption of risk. Assumption of risk is a legal theory that holds that if a person engages in a risky activity, they accept the risks associated with that activity. In this case, the defendant may argue that the plaintiff, as a professional jockey, assumed the risks associated with riding in a horse race, including the risk of injury.
The defendant may also argue that the plaintiff was aware of the dangers of horse racing and chose to participate anyway, thereby assuming the risk of injury. To succeed with an assumption of risk defense, the defendant must prove that the plaintiff knew of the risks and voluntarily chose to assume them.
Learn more about plaintiff here:https://brainly.com/question/7315287
#SPJ1
what were the crimes commited during the mass prison era
Answer:
Murder
Negligent manslaughter
Robbery
Most societies contain diverse and sometimes conflicting elements within them.
O True
O False
The statement that "Most societies contain diverse and sometimes conflicting elements within them," is True.
How are societies diverse ?Most societies are diverse and contain different groups with distinct cultural, economic, political, and social characteristics. These groups may have conflicting interests, values, and beliefs, and may compete for resources and power within society.
As a result, social tensions and conflicts can arise, and societies may struggle to maintain social cohesion and stability. However, societies also have mechanisms for resolving conflicts, negotiating differences, and promoting cooperation and collaboration among different groups.
Find out more on diversity at https://brainly.com/question/12407924
#SPJ1
Please choose the most common units of astronomical distances used in astronomy. Choose three.
Feet (ft)
Parsec (pc)
Centimeters (cm)
Miles (mi)
Light-year (ly)
Meter (m)
Astronomical Unit (AU)
Solar-year (sy)
PLEASE ANSWER!!
29. Define the terms.
exclusive jurisdiction:
concurrent jurisdiction:
original jurisdiction:
appellate jurisdiction:
Exclusive jurisdiction refers to a legal authority or power held by a court or other judicial body to hear and decide certain types of cases to the exclusion of all other courts.
What is an Example?For example, some federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over patent disputes.
Concurrent jurisdiction is when two or more courts have the authority to hear and decide the same type of case. For example, both federal and state courts may have concurrent jurisdiction over certain types of civil cases.
Original jurisdiction refers to a court's power to hear a case for the first time. This is typically the trial court level, where evidence is presented, and a decision is made. In contrast, appellate jurisdiction refers to a court's power to review and potentially overturn decisions made by lower courts, typically on legal grounds rather than factual ones.
Read more about jurisdiction here:
https://brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ1
Why do police generally not like to respond to domestic violence calls?
Answer:
Domestic violence in India includes any form of violence suffered by a person from a biological relative but typically is the violence suffered by a woman by male members of her family or relatives. Although Men also suffer Domestic violence, the law under IPC 498A specifically protects only women.
Briefly summarize the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth U.S. Constitutional Amendments.
The various amendments in the US constitution protects and gives right it citizens from different categories.
What is the summary of the fourth, fifth, eight and fourteenth US constitutional amendments?The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. It requires that search and arrest warrants be based on probable cause and describe the specific place to be searched or the person or thing to be seized.
The Fifth Amendment provides several protections for individuals accused of crimes, including the right to remain silent, protection against self-incrimination, and the right to due process of law. It also prohibits double jeopardy, or being tried twice for the same offense.
The Eighth Amendment prohibits excessive bail and fines and prohibits cruel and unusual punishment.
The Fourteenth Amendment guarantees equal protection of the laws for all citizens and requires that states provide due process of law before depriving anyone of life, liberty, or property. It also includes the citizenship clause, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the United States.
Learn more on US constitution here;
https://brainly.com/question/3638438
#SPJ1
write a thesis about Bentleys law
Bentley's law, also known as the principle of anticipatory repudiation, is a legal concept that allows a party to a contract to terminate the agreement if they have reason to believe that the other party will not fulfill their obligations. This law serves as a crucial tool in contract law, as it seeks to prevent future disputes and promote efficiency in negotiations. The principle of anticipatory repudiation provides a legal framework for parties to act in good faith, encouraging them to fulfill their contractual obligations promptly and honorably. Through the application of Bentley's law, parties can better preserve and protect their rights, thus promoting fairness and equity in the contractual relationship.
What are the characteristics of a legal custom
Answer:
Explanation:
A legal custom is the established pattern of behavior that can be objectively verified within a particular social setting. A claim can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted by law".
Answer: A legal custom is the established pattern of behavior that can be objectively verified within a particular social setting. A claim can be carried out in defense of "what has always been done and accepted by law".
Explanation:
How do different governments influence one another?
Governments can influence each other in various ways, including through diplomacy, economic ties, military alliances, cultural exchange, and international organizations. Here are some examples:
Diplomacy: Governments can engage in diplomatic efforts to promote their interests and influence other countries. This can include negotiations, treaties, and agreements between governments to address issues of mutual concern, such as trade, security, or environmental protection.
Economic ties: Governments can influence each other through their economic relations, such as trade agreements and foreign investment. Economic sanctions or tariffs can also be used to pressure governments to change their policies.
Military alliances: Governments can form alliances with other countries for mutual defense and security. These alliances can influence each other's military strategies and policies, as well as their relationships with other countries.
Cultural exchange: Governments can promote cultural exchange and cooperation through programs such as student exchanges, cultural festivals, and language programs. This can help foster understanding and positive relationships between countries.
International organizations: Governments can influence each other through international organizations such as the United Nations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund. These organizations provide a forum for countries to cooperate on global issues, such as climate change, human rights, and economic development.
Overall, governments can influence each other in a range of ways, and the nature of these interactions depends on the specific goals and priorities of each government.
How are US Supreme Court justices placed in their positions?
A. nonpartisan election
B. congressional election
C. appointment
D. partisan election
Answer:
c
Explanation:
all us justices are nominated by the President, confirmed by the Senate, and hold a life tenure
Why Cant Pray Mantis Be Killed?
Answer:
There is no factual basis to the claim that praying mantises cannot be killed. Praying mantises, like any other living organism, can be killed through various means such as physical force, chemicals, or environmental factors. It is possible that this idea may have originated from the praying mantis's reputation for being a formidable predator and its ability to defend itself against threats. However, this does not mean that the praying mantis is invincible or immune to death.
Answer:
people are afraid to kill it because some are scared of it . and some believe when you kill it it causes bad luck
The estimated cost to America for traffic crashes caused by underage drinkers is more than ___________ billion dollars per year.
Answer:
According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in 2010, the estimated economic cost of crashes involving underage drinking was $24 billion per year in the United States. However, it is important to note that this figure may have changed in recent years due to various factors such as changes in traffic laws, population growth, and changes in alcohol consumption patterns.
I Hope This Helps!