Changes to the voting process affect voter participation because More people voted.
How was voter participation affectedChanges to the voting process can have a significant impact on voter participation. The impact of these changes can vary depending on the nature of the changes and the context in which they are implemented.
However, in general, changes that make it easier and more convenient for people to vote tend to increase voter participation, while changes that make it more difficult or complicated to vote tend to decrease participation.
Read more on voter participation here:https://brainly.com/question/29637406
#SPJ1
Using the words in the word bank below, write a brief (4-5 sentence) summary of the Protestant Reformation.
→║Corrupt ║ Indulgences ║Martin Luther ║ 95 Theses ║ Printing Press║ Heresy║←
Answer the question you have to answer the question and answer it yourself and you have a better answer for you then you have to ask me the questions you have and you don’t
Explanation:
What are the benefits of trading goods with people from other lands?
URGENT PLEASE ANWSER!!!!!
Answer:
you can get goods that you may not have
Answer:
Adding to what it says on top
Explanation:
You can also discover different culture and if you have a culture your culture can spread
HOPE THIS HELPS
How can the atom bomb be linked to the scientists in the article? What impact did the Manhattan project have on the world?
Answer:that mean someone who was bad person putting bomb
Explanation:
was colonisation a blessing or a curse
Answer:
I guess you can see that from both the sides it is blessing as well as curse .
Explanation:
Colonization has impacted all the aspect of a country,both positively and negatively.
Which type of firm is likely to have the greatest number of owners?
Group of answer choices
A) franchise
B) sole proprietorship
C) corporation
D) partnership
Answer:
C) corporation
How are the other mass atrocities similar to genocide
Answer:
The other mass atrocities are similar to genocide in that they involve the intentional and systematic killing of a large group of people. These acts often involve the targeting of individuals based on their ethnicity, religion, or other identifying factors. Additionally, both genocide and other mass atrocities can involve the use of violence, torture, and other forms of cruelty in order to achieve their goals. The effects of both genocide and other mass atrocities can be long-lasting and have profound impacts on the individuals and communities affected. Ultimately, both genocide and other mass atrocities represent a grave violation of human rights and are considered to be among the most serious crimes that can be committed against a group of people.
How did some justify the actions of the Indian Removal act?
Question 3 options:
That is was necessary for the survival of the United States of America.
Rationalized that it would save Natives from harassment from whites and they could live in an area where they could govern themselves.
Natives did not need to land so they could live anywhere.
The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was widely controversial at the time, as it forced the relocation of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands in the southeastern United States to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River. Despite this, some Americans justified the act in several ways.
One of the most common justifications was that the removal of Native Americans was necessary for the survival of the United States of America. Supporters of this view argued that the expansion of white settlers into Native American lands was inevitable and that the only way to prevent conflict was to remove the tribes to a designated area. They believed that the relocation would allow for the continued growth of the United States and its economy. This justification was supported by some of the most powerful politicians of the day, including President Andrew Jackson, who famously said in his first State of the Union address, "The waves of population and civilization are rolling to the westward, and we now propose to acquire the countries occupied by the red men of the South and West by a fair exchange, and, at the expense of the United States, to send them to land where their existence may be prolonged and perhaps made perpetual."
Another justification for the Indian Removal Act was the belief that it would save Native Americans from harassment from whites and allow them to live in an area where they could govern themselves. Proponents of this view argued that Native Americans were being mistreated and displaced by white settlers and that relocation to Indian Territory would protect them from further harm. They believed that the arrangement would allow Native Americans to maintain their cultural traditions and govern themselves without interference from white authorities. This view was also supported by some Native American leaders, who saw the relocation as a way to avoid further conflict with white settlers.
However, there were also those who believed that Native Americans did not need land and that they could live anywhere. This view was based on the idea that land was a commodity that could be bought and sold, and that Native Americans did not have a legitimate claim to the land they inhabited. Supporters of this argument believed that Native Americans could live in any area that was not already claimed by white settlers, and that the Indian Removal Act was therefore justified. This view was often used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands, as it suggested that they had no real rights to the land and that they could be moved at the will of the government.
In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified by some Americans on the grounds that it was necessary for the survival of the United States, would protect Native Americans from white harassment, and that Native Americans did not have a legitimate claim to land. Despite these justifications, the act remains a controversial and tragic chapter in American history. The forced relocation of thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands caused immense suffering and loss of life, and it is a reminder of the dark side of American expansionism and the treatment of indigenous peoples.
Why did the Screen
Actors Guild agreed to blacklist members of its own union?
The Screen Actors Guild (SAG) did not agree to blacklist the members of its own union.
What is a union?Social union is a term used to describe the network of relationships, interactions, and shared values that connect individuals and communities within a society. It refers to the social cohesion that results from individuals and groups coming together to form a collective identity and sense of belonging. Social union is fostered through the development of strong social networks, inclusive institutions, and supportive policies that promote social equality, fairness, and mutual respect. It is important for building social capital, promoting economic growth, and ensuring the well-being of all members of society. Social union also plays a critical role in promoting social justice and addressing systemic inequalities by providing opportunities for marginalized individuals and communities to participate fully in society.
To learn more about union, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16655124
#SPJ1
How did the US government respond to Robert Oppenheimer's opposition to developing the hydrogen bomb?
• He was given a different position in the government.
• He continued to head atomic research for the government.
• He was accused of disloyalty and lost his security clearance.
• He continued to do atomic research but at a lower level.
The ideal solution is (C). He was charged with disloyalty the cause and lost his security clearance.
What part in the creation of the atomic bomb did Robert Oppenheimer play?American theoretical physicist Robert Oppenheimer lived from 1904 until 1967. Oppenheimer served as the Los Alamos Laboratory's director during the Manhattan Project and was in charge of the development of the atomic bomb. As the "father of the atomic bomb," he is well-known.
Oppenheimer opposed the bomb for what reason?The research on thermonuclear weapons had taken over the atomic energy programme, and Oppenheimer fiercely opposed the hydrogen bomb (H-bomb) and other similar weapons on the grounds that they were more destructive than mankind could reasonably control.
To know more about Robert Oppenheimer visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/5018851
#SPJ9
Which of the following is not true
Answer:
Which of the following is not true about Israel?
A. It is bordered by Lebanon. True
B. It is a country in Southwest Asia. True
C It has an abundant supply of river systems.Explanation:
You're welcome.
Please help me i’ll give brainlies
There was more time for work and play thanks to electricity. Better communication was made possible by the telegraph.
How would you They used their newly acquired free time. Similar activities to those individuals engage in today existed after the Civil War.Because of electricity, there was more time for both work and recreation. The telegraph's creation paved the way for improved communication. Oil made it possible for them to pay less. They are connected to the modern revolution because by increasing social interaction and creating new jobs, they enable people to access a variety of information. Thanks to technology, people can now accomplish more from home. Examples include paying bills, doing research, shopping, and so forth.
People started attending to movie theaters, sent telegraphs to connect with one another, went shopping, read newspapers, visited amusement parks, witnessed Wild West performances, and went to concerts. They also watched and played sports. They also attended plays and the Vaudeville performance. Several of these hobbies are still something we do in our free time today.
Learn more about communication: https://brainly.com/question/22558440
#SPJ1
In response to Texas becoming a state, Mexico
A- denounced its admittance into the US
B- welcomed news of a new state for the US
C- was indifferent
D- declared war
Answer:
A denounced it
Explanation:
Why is longanimity a frequent team appearing throughout the speech?
Answer: Your longanimity is what keeps you calm and patient, even when you're running late on a crowded bus that's stuck in rush hour traffic.
Explanation:
Discuss the development of the earliest civilizations, highlighting at least two of them to
explain how societies developed, changed and functioned. What were their political,
social, economic and religious/philosophical systems like?
The earliest civilizations developed around the same time in different parts of the world. Two of the most notable civilizations were those of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations.
What is civilizations?Civilizations are complex societies that have developed over a long period of time, often through the exchange of ideas, technology and resources. They are marked by a number of characteristics, including the development of cities, states, and empires, the emergence of organized religions, the growth of trade and commerce, the use of writing, and the development of scientific knowledge and technology.
The earliest civilizations developed around the same time in different parts of the world. Two of the most notable civilizations were those of the Mesopotamian and Egyptian civilizations.
The Mesopotamian civilization developed in the region of modern-day Iraq, between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. This civilization was based on agriculture, which was made possible by the rivers.
The Egyptian civilization developed along the banks of the Nile river. This civilization was also based on agriculture, and their political system was a monarchy.
Both of these civilizations had complex political, social, economic and religious/philosophical systems that developed over time and allowed them to thrive. They were both based on agriculture and trade, and had complex religious and philosophical systems. They both had monarchies as their political systems, and the religion and philosophy of both civilizations was polytheistic.
To learn more about civilizations
https://brainly.com/question/25138480
#SPJ1
The reforms of Gracchi brothers and how it was accepted
The reforms of the Gracchi brothers were met with mixed reactions from the people of Rome. On the one hand, their reforms helped to address many of the social and economic problems that were plaguing Rome at the time, such as widespread poverty and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a small elite.
However, their reforms also faced significant opposition from powerful individuals and groups within Roman society, particularly among the conservative senatorial class who saw the Gracchi brothers as a threat to their own power and authority.
Despite this opposition, the Gracchi brothers were able to achieve some significant reforms during their time in office, including the establishment of a system of subsidized grain distribution to the urban poor, the redistribution of public land to small farmers, and the extension of Roman citizenship to non-elite groups.
Overall, the legacy of the Gracchi brothers remains a subject of debate among historians, with most seeing them as heroic champions of the rights of the common people.
To learn more about the Gracchi brothers reforms, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2411878
Which following did the People’s party believed give them more political power in the 1800s
Answer:
choosing senators through direct election
Explanation:
Where can I get a copy of "My New York" by Irving Berlin in sheet music format?
My Bluebird Was Caught In The Rain, by Irving Berlin 1930 Sheet Music,... Vintage 1927 New York Sheet Music Mayor of New York, James J. Walker, and Eddie Cantor.
Bluebirds do they visit bird feeders?
Bird feeders for specific foods, bird baths for water, and bird houses for nesting are all places they will go. Here are some foods, feeders, bird baths, and houses to attract and keep Eastern Bluebirds in your yard. While the eastern bluebird is not threatened or endangered, its population has declined as nesting sites have been taken over by more aggressive species such as house sparrows and European starlings.
To know more about Eddie Cantor visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1952334
#SPJ9
According Oakes, why did Frederick Douglass defend John Brown so adamantly after
Brown's failed invasion of Harpers Ferry?
a) Douglass empathized with how John Brown was denounced and shunned
by the North.
b) Douglass supported violent change by whatever means.
Oc) Douglass had intended to invade Harpers Ferry with Brown.
d) Both B and C
Answer:
According to Oakes, the reason why Frederick Douglass defended John Brown so adamantly after Brown's failed invasion of Harpers Ferry was because of option a) Douglass empathized with how John Brown was denounced and shunned by the North. Douglass believed that Brown was a man of principle who had acted on behalf of the enslaved people, and he felt that Brown's motives and intentions were honorable. Despite the fact that Brown's raid was unsuccessful, Douglass believed that it had galvanized anti-slavery sentiment and that it had exposed the hypocrisy of the North's claims to moral superiority.
According to Oakes, the reason why Frederick Douglass defended John Brown so adamantly after Brown's failed invasion of Harpers Ferry was Douglass empathized with how John Brown was denounced and shunned by the North. Thus, option a is correct.
What was the invasion of Harpers Ferry?The invasion of Harpers Ferry was an important event in the history of the United States that occurred on October 16-18, 1859. It was led by John Brown, an abolitionist who believed in the violent overthrow of slavery in the United States.
John Brown and a group of 21 men (including 5 African Americans) attacked the federal armory at Harpers Ferry, Virginia (now West Virginia). Brown hoped to capture the armory, seize its weapons, and use them to arm slaves for a rebellion against their owners.
However, the attack was quickly suppressed by local militia and federal troops led by Colonel Robert E. Lee, who was then a lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army.
The raiders were surrounded and eventually forced to surrender. Several of Brown's men were killed, and ten were captured, including Brown himself. Brown and his co-conspirators were tried and convicted of treason, murder, and inciting a slave insurrection. Brown was hanged on December 2, 1859.
The invasion of Harpers Ferry was a significant event that further heightened tensions between the North and South, and is often cited as one of the events that led to the American Civil War.
Learn more about the invasion of Harpers Ferry here:
https://brainly.com/question/9739453
#SPJ2
Lessons that can be learnt from the Gracchi brothers experience in our modern era
Explanation:
Compare and contrast vision statements with mission statements in terms of composition and importance
What was warfare like? What was happening on the battlefield that was causing total devastation.
Warfare involved close combat and the use of increasingly lethal and destructive weapons, causing unprecedented carnage and destruction.
Fighting since forever ago has been portrayed by its mercilessness and complete destruction. On the front line, fighters participated in close battle utilizing weapons like blades, lances, and withdraws from appearance of explosive. With the presentation of guns, fights turned out to be more deadly and horrendous, as troopers could draw in their adversaries from more noteworthy distances. During The Second Great War, the utilization of automatic rifles, cannons, and compound weapons caused uncommon slaughter and obliteration. Troopers confronted steady risk from adversary fire, sickness, and openness to unforgiving conditions. The inescapable utilization of besieging strikes during The Second Great War added another degree of obliteration, as urban communities and regular citizen populaces became focuses for annihilation. Generally, fighting has been and keeps on being quite possibly of humankind's most pulverizing action.
To learn more about warfare and devastation, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/30031250
Question 9 of 10
What is one major problem created by globalization?
A. It has become more difficult to get products made in other
countries.
B. Military conflicts between powerful nations have increased.
C. Fewer workers are able to get an education related to their jobs.
D. An increase in international shipping has led to more pollution.
SURMIT
Answer: D. An increase in international shipping has led to more pollution.
How did the U.S. seek to change its role in Latin America under the 'Good
Neighbor Policy'?
The Roosevelt administration signed agreements formalizing this new respect and sought to negotiate mutually beneficial trade agreements with Latin American countries. The benefits of the Good Neighbor Policy became evident when nearly every country in the region aligned itself with the United States in World War II.
Question 17
What was built on the land bought during the Gadsden Purchase?
Answer:
Gadsden died before he could complete his railroad. The first transcontinental railroad was built farther north instead. A southern railroad across the land from the Gadsden Purchase was not completed until the 1880s.
Explanation:
How did geographic expansion impact the rights in opportunities of Americans native Americans and Mexicans
The theory underpinned American territorial expansion in the 19th century and served as justification for the eviction of Native Americans or other ethnic groups from ancestral homes.
What impact did US immigration have on Native Americans?Either a voluntary or forced relocation took place. Patrols from the army and the militia watched the tribes' westward migration. And over 70,000 Native Americans are thought to have been transferred by the government between 1830 and 1840; thousands of them perished along the route that became known as that of the Trail of Tears. As more states were admitted to the Union as a result of the United States' rapid growth, the problem of slavery became more pressing and the Civil War eventually broke out.
To know more about Trail of Tears visit:
https://brainly.com/question/674671
#SPJ1
How did Octavian gain power in Rome?
A. He married Cleopatra .
B. He defeated Marc Antony .
C. He defeated the troops of Augustus .
D. He overthrew Julius Caesar .
What led to the rise of slave codes?
Answer:
The rise of slave codes was a response to the growing number of enslaved Africans in the Americas during the 17th and 18th centuries. These codes were designed to establish a legal framework for the control and management of enslaved populations, ensuring that slaveholders had complete authority over their human property.
If you found this response helpful, please consider marking it as brainliest.
Judges in federal appellatecourts determine whether
The task of the appellate court is to determine whether or not the law was correctly applied in the trial court. Appeals courts have three judges and no jury.
In India, what exactly is an appeal court?
The ability of a court to hear/review a case decided by a lower court is referred to as appellate jurisdiction. Both the Supreme Court and the High Courts have appellate jurisdiction in India. They have the authority to reverse or uphold lower court rulings. The first appeal is made to an officer designated by the public authority as the First Appellate Authority within the public authority itself. The CPIO has less authority than the First Appellate Authority. The Central Information Commission will consider the second appeal.
To know more about judges visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1078357
#SPJ9
reflection about indigenous culture in the philippines
Who was the person that ruled Germany in WWII and that thought Jews were not good enough?
Answer:
Hitler.
Explanation:
yeah.not a good person
James K Polk arose as a presidential candidate with a message of
A- westward expansion
B- isolationism
C- peace with Mexico
D- better trading networks with Canada
Answer:
A- Westward expansion.
Explanation:
James K. Polk ran for president in 1844 with a platform that included a commitment to westward expansion. He believed in Manifest Destiny, the idea that it was America's destiny to expand its territory to the Pacific Ocean. Specifically, Polk advocated for the annexation of Texas and the acquisition of Oregon from Britain. As president, Polk pursued these goals and oversaw the Mexican-American War, which resulted in the United States gaining a large portion of Mexico's territory, including what is now California, Nevada, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, and parts of Colorado, Wyoming, Kansas, and Oklahoma.