What is the significance of this event in the Civil War?
Question 4 options:
The invasion of the Confederate capital forced it to surrender.
The Confederate attack on the Union fort initiated the war.
The Confederate defense of the besieged fort lengthened the war.
The Union victory divided the Confederacy at the Mississippi River.
American Civil War: Its Significance The Confederate attack on the Union fort initiated the war.
What Civil War battle was the most important, and why?The turning point in the Civil War was the Battle of Gettysburg. The three-day confrontation was the bloodiest single combat of the war, with over 50,000 estimated losses.
Which battles in the civil war were important?There were numerous important and small battles and military events during the United States Civil War, which was fought between 1861 and 1865. The Vicksburg Campaign, the First Battle of Bull Run, the Battle of Shiloh, the Battle of Antietam, the Battle of Gettysburg, and the Battle of Antietam were among the most crucial.
To know more about American Civil War visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/22808456
#SPJ1
THIS IS FOR ECONOMICS (please help)
Gas prices have risen over a dollar the last 3 months. Apply the concept of supply and demand and explain what would happen to the supply of gas and the demand for gas as a result of this increase
Answer:
demand decrease, supply increase
Explanation:
consumers will reduce spending with price increases, so demand will decrease. Therefore supply will increase as supply is inversely proportional to demand in this model.
what historical lessons, if any, can we draw from the rise, expansion, and/or fall of the roman republic?
The Roman Republic teaches many lessons about the rise and fall of civilizations. It is a reminder that no state or government is immune to internal strife and external threats. The Roman Republic provides examples of the importance of a strong military, the necessity of sound fiscal policy, and the need for effective political leadership. It also shows how having a powerful and ambitious leader can lead to an empire's rapid expansion, yet also its eventual collapse. The historical lessons that can be drawn from the rise, expansion, and/or fall of the Roman Republic are as follows:The rise of the Roman Republic can teach us a lot about governance, power distribution, and social organization.
The Roman Republic was founded in 509 BCE after the overthrow of the Etruscan dynasty. This marked the beginning of Roman domination in the Mediterranean world. The Romans established a system of government that was based on checks and balances, which helped them to maintain social stability and control.The expansion of the Roman Republic teaches us about the dangers of imperialism, the importance of diplomacy, and the consequences of overreaching. The Roman Republic expanded through a series of wars, conquests, and treaties. This expansion brought many benefits to the Roman people, including increased trade, wealth, and access to resources. However, it also brought many challenges, including cultural clashes, military overextension, and political corruption.The fall of the Roman Republic teaches us about the dangers of internal conflict, the importance of civic responsibility, and the consequences of authoritarianism. The Roman Republic was a republic in name only by the time of Julius Caesar, who was assassinated by his own senators. This assassination marked the end of the Roman Republic and the beginning of the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire was marked by authoritarianism, political instability, and social unrest, which eventually led to the fall of the Roman Empire in 476 CE.
For more such questions on Roman Republic
https://brainly.com/question/14474446
#SPJ11
Why is the court system in the United States called a dual court system?
Answer:
The court system in the United States is called a dual court system because it consists of two separate and distinct court systems that operate at both the federal and state levels: the federal court system and the state court system.
The federal court system includes the Supreme Court of the United States, which is the highest court in the land, and other lower federal courts established by Congress. These courts have jurisdiction over cases that involve federal law, the United States Constitution, and disputes between parties from different states or countries.
On the other hand, each state has its own court system, which includes trial courts, intermediate appellate courts, and a state supreme court. These courts have jurisdiction over cases that involve state law, and disputes between parties that are located within the state's boundaries.
Therefore, the dual court system is designed to ensure that both federal and state laws are enforced, and that disputes are resolved in the appropriate court based on the type of case and the jurisdiction involved.
I Hope This Helps!
Answer:
Due to its operation at both the federal and state levels.
Explanation:
The judicial system in the United States is known as a dual court system. The Supreme Court and subordinate federal courts make up the federal court system. State supreme courts, appellate courts, and trial courts make up the state judicial system. Each jurisdiction has its own court system, and there are some situations where the two court systems interact.
State level governments are based on the organization of:
The Federalist Papers
The Declaration of Independence
the national government outlined in the Constitution
O monarchies in Europe
ext incorrect question
BRE
State level governments are based on the organization of C . the national government outlined in the Constitution .
How are state level governments organized in the United States ?The Constitution outlines the powers and responsibilities of both the federal government and the state governments, and establishes a system of checks and balances to ensure that no one branch of government becomes too powerful.
State level governments have their own constitutions, which outline the structure and powers of their respective state governments within the framework of the federal system .
Find out more on state level governments at https://brainly.com/question/25192887
#SPJ1
what were the fascists doing to the jews in budapest? why did the others refuse to take this action seriously?
03/08/23-how were fannie lou and septima clark similar? someone please help, im the only one with this assignment bc my teacher is mean someone please help, im begging!
Both Fannie Lou Hamer and Septima Clark were tenacious civil rights activists who devoted their lives to advancing the voting, educational, and social rights of African Americans.
Famous civil rights advocates Septima Clark and Fannie Lou Hamer campaigned for the same rights for African Americans in the United States. They shared various characteristics:
Fannie Lou Hamer played a major role in the Mississippi Freedom Democratic Party's efforts to register voters, and Septima Clark worked to set up citizenship programmes that assisted African Americans in passing voter registration exams. Both women were active in the fight for voting rights.Fannie Lou Hamer was assaulted and imprisoned for her advocacy work, and Septima Clark encountered prejudice and intimidation as a black woman in the South. Both of these activists overcame enormous challenges.Septima Clark, a teacher who believed that education was crucial to attaining social justice, and Fannie Lou Hamer, who fought to construct community centres that offered education and other services to African American communities, both believed in the power of education.Fannie Lou Hamer worked with Martin Luther King Jr. and other well-known civil rights activists, and Septima Clark was close with Ella Baker and was instrumental in putting together the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. They both collaborated with other civil rights leaders.To know more about Septima Clark
brainly.com/question/12695503
#SPJ4
what were two of the three political blunders made by president wilson at the end of the war? answer in two to three sentences.
One of President Wilson's political blunders was his decision to personally lead the American delegation to the Paris Peace Conference, which was seen as a departure from previous presidential protocol.
What other important political blunder did Wilson make?Another blunder was his failure to bring prominent Republicans to the conference, which led to their opposition to the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations, ultimately resulting in the treaty's rejection by the US Senate.
These political blunders saw him being criticized by many people in the American media and opposition parties.
Read more about President Wilson here:
https://brainly.com/question/4112868
#SPJ1
how were religious traditions similar in mesopotamia, ancient egypt, and the ancient indus river valley?
In Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, and the ancient Indus River Valley, religious traditions had certain similarities. Let's take a closer look at some of these similarities in this article.
Religious Traditions in Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt, and the Ancient Indus River Valley
There were similarities between the religious traditions of Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, and the ancient Indus River Valley. Here are some of them:
Polytheistic religious traditions
In all three civilizations, the majority of people adhered to a polytheistic religious tradition. People worshiped several deities or gods, and these gods were believed to control various aspects of human life.
Belief in an afterlife
All three cultures had a strong belief in an afterlife, and people thought that their actions in this life would impact their lives in the next world. This belief provided people with hope and consolation.
The importance of gods and goddesses
In each civilization, gods and goddesses played a crucial role in people's lives. The Mesopotamian god Marduk, the Egyptian god Ra, and the Indus River Valley's mother goddess are examples of some of the most significant deities in these cultures.
Religious symbols
All three cultures used religious symbols to convey their beliefs. The Eye of Horus was an important symbol in ancient Egypt, while the Swastika was a symbol of prosperity and good fortune in the Indus River Valley.
Priests and religious leaders
The role of priests and religious leaders was critical in all three cultures. They were responsible for leading religious ceremonies, interpreting religious texts, and ensuring that the gods were pleased with the people's actions.
Worship of natural forces
Finally, all three cultures worshiped natural forces, such as the sun, the moon, and the river. They believed that these natural forces had the power to influence human life, and they sought to honor them through religious ceremonies and offerings.
In conclusion, we can say that the religious traditions of Mesopotamia, ancient Egypt, and the ancient Indus River Valley were similar in many respects.
To learn more about Indus river valley, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/18748104
#SPJ11
in the early twentieth century, angel island served as the main entry point for immigrants from: group of answer choices mexico. japan. brazil. china.
Angel Island in San Francisco Bay was the main entry point for immigrants from China, Japan, Mexico, and Brazil during the early 20th century.
Located in the middle of San Francisco Bay, Angel Island was the primary port of entry for Asian immigrants to the United States during this time period.
Immigrants would be subjected to stringent questioning and medical inspections as they entered the United States. For example, Chinese immigrants were required to prove their legal status as merchants, students, diplomats, or returning residents of the United States in order to gain entry.
If they were unable to do so, they would be denied entry and returned to their country of origin. Japanese immigrants were subjected to similar questioning and medical inspections.
In addition to facing long waits and interrogations, many immigrants were detained at Angel Island for weeks or even months. During this time, immigrants were housed in barracks-style buildings and kept under close watch.
Although the detention process could be grueling and discouraging, it was intended to prevent the entry of criminals and other undesirables into the United States.
Overall, Angel Island was the main entry point for immigrants from China, Japan, Mexico, and Brazil during the early 20th century. Immigrants were subjected to stringent questioning and medical inspections upon entry, and some were even detained for weeks or months.
Despite the hardships, Angel Island served as a gateway to the American Dream for many immigrants.
To know more about Angel Island refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/10694431
#SPJ11
how did common people learn about the roman catholic faith? common people were encouraged to read the bible. the art and architecture of cathedrals instructed common people. common learned about the church by interacting with nature. adults were required to attend a bible school.
In middle age and early present day Europe, average citizens found out about the Roman Catholic church through different means, which included:
1. Community gatherings: The essential way everyday citizens found out about the confidence was through going to faith gatherings.
2. Book of scriptures Readings: While the facts really confirm that the Roman Catholic Church supported perusing the Book of scriptures, admittance to the Holy book itself was restricted for commoners because of the shortage and cost of manually written duplicates.
3. Strict Workmanship and Engineering: Basilicas, temples, and strict craftsmanships assumed a pivotal part in teaching and moving ordinary citizens about the Catholic confidence.
4. Strict Celebrations and Parades: Celebrations and parades were critical local area occasions that permitted ordinary citizens to partake in strict ceremonies and draw in with the Catholic confidence.
Learn more about Roman Catholic Church, from:
brainly.com/question/10203695
#SPJ12
despite initially intending to work with the british government to bring about self-rule, the indian national congress turned to new tactics as a result of
Despite initially intending to work with the British government to bring about self-rule, the Indian National Congress turned to new tactics as a result of mounting frustration over the lack of progress made by the British government.
The Indian National Congress, formed in 1885, aimed at introducing democracy in India by taking part in elections and passing laws that were favorable to the country's interests. The Indian National Congress initially worked with the British government to bring about self-rule.
The British government implemented the Government of India Act in 1919, which increased the powers of the Indian Legislative Council. However, the act also introduced the Diarchy system, which meant that the Indian Legislative Council was divided into two branches.
The first branch, consisting of Indian officials and ministers, was responsible for the internal administration of the country's provinces. The second branch was in charge of finance, public works, and other critical topics. The British Government maintained control over the second branch.
There was mounting frustration over the lack of progress made by the British government, and people began to realize that the British government would not agree to Indian self-rule anytime soon.
Therefore, the Indian National Congress turned to new tactics to bring about Indian self-rule. Gandhi's Non-Cooperation Movement and Civil Disobedience Movement were two of the new tactics used to bring about self-rule.
To know more about Indian National Congress, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/881451#
#SPJ11
The three estates of French society were primarily distinguished by _____
The three estates of French society were primarily distinguished by their social status and level of privilege.
The clergy, who were exempt from paying taxes and had substantial political clout, made up the First Estate. The nobility, who were also exempt from paying taxes and occupied the majority of the top positions in the executive, judicial, and armed forces, made up the Second Estate. Everyone else, including urban laborers, peasants, and members of the bourgeoisie (middle class), who lacked political clout and paid high taxes, made up the Third Estate. The tensions and inequities that finally gave rise to the French Revolution were a result of this societal separation based on social standing and privilege.
To know more about French Revolution
brainly.com/question/2796465
#SPJ4
What was the result of the Hay -Bunau-Varilla Treaty?
Answer:
The Hay Bunau-Varilla Treaty gave the United States canal rights in Panama.
How did the Allies at the Paris Peace Conference continue foreign imperialism in China, angering those in the Nationalist movement?
Group of answer choices
They denied them the right to self-determination by giving control of German colonies in China to the USA
They denied them the right to self-determination by giving control of German colonies in China to the Koreans
They denied them the right to self-determination by giving control of German colonies in China to the Japanese
They denied them the right to self-determination by giving control of German colonies in China to the French
The Allies at the Paris Peace Conference continued foreign imperialism in China, angering those in the Nationalist movement by denying them the right to self-determination by giving control of German colonies in China to the Japanese. Therefore the correct option is option D.
The Paris Peace Conference was held in Paris from January 18, 1919, to January 21, 1920. It was a gathering of the victorious Allied Powers after the end of World War I to lay down the law for the defeated Central Powers.
The Allies at the Paris Peace Conference continued foreign imperialism in China, angering those in the Nationalist movement by denying them the right to self-determination by giving control of German colonies in China to the Japanese.
The Allies created the Twenty-one Demands to pressure China to comply with Japanese demands. Japan was given economic privileges and political dominance in northeastern China as a result of these agreements. This outraged many Chinese, including the Nationalist Party, who began to blame foreign countries for the country's difficulties.
For such more question on imperialism:
https://brainly.com/question/377688
#SPJ11
how were european colonial slave societies different from slave societies in ancient greece, china, or the islamic mediterranean?
European colonial slave societies were different from slave societies in ancient Greece, China, and the Islamic Mediterranean in various ways. In ancient Greece, slavery was often the result of debt, conquest in war, or punishment for crime,
Slaves in China were often the descendants of defeated enemies in war or criminals. The Islamic Mediterranean relied on a system of serfdom and slavery that provided slave labor in agriculture, domestic work, and artisan trades.
In contrast, European colonial slave societies were largely based on the trans-Atlantic slave trade, in which Africans were forcibly transported across the Atlantic and enslaved in the New World.
1. In ancient Greece, slavery was often the result of debt, conquest in war, or punishment for crime.
2. Slaves in China were often the descendants of defeated enemies in war or criminals.
3. The Islamic Mediterranean relied on a system of serfdom and slavery that provided slave labor in agriculture, domestic work, and artisan trades.
4. In contrast, European colonial slave societies were largely based on the trans-Atlantic slave trade, in which Africans were forcibly transported across the Atlantic and enslaved in the New World.
To know more about slaves refer to-
brainly.com/question/1227465#
#SPJ11
what similarities and differences does kennedy see between the world now and the world as it was during the american revolution (paragraph 3)? how does he think these similarities and differences affect the american commitment to human rights?
The similarities and differences that Kennedy sees between the world now and the world as it was during the American Revolution (paragraph 3) is that both have been facing some forms of human rights abuses while they also uphold and fight for the promotion of human rights.
The effects of these similarities and differences on the American commitment to human rights are that the commitment to the promotion of human rights has been inconsistent throughout history. It has been possible to maintain the commitment at times, such as during the American Revolution, but at other times, it has faltered.
For example, Kennedy argues that during the Cold War, the United States' commitment to human rights was inconsistent, and it was more interested in pursuing a policy of containment against the Soviet Union than promoting human rights.
For such more question on human rights:
https://brainly.com/question/28634197
#SPJ11
Best Answer Gets Brainliest.
Who was banned by Congress from voting, and who were the three groups of new voters in the South? Write each answer below the appropriate symbol.
Answer:
The group of people who were banned by Congress from voting were the Confederates who had held office or fought against the Union during the Civil War.
Three groups of new voters in the South were:
African Americans
Northerners who had moved to the South
White Southerners who had not supported the Confederacy during the Civil War.
why did the cherokee nation act to protect its homelands?
The Cherokee Nation took action to defend its ancestral lands because the US government was threatening to forcibly remove them.
The Cherokee Nation lived in the southern United States at the beginning of the 19th century, including sections of modern-day North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, and Georgia. Yet when white settlers grew closer to Cherokee territory, the US government pushed for their eviction to make room for additional settling. The Indian Removal Act, which was approved in 1830, gave permission for the forcible transfer of Native American tribes to Indian Territory in modern-day Oklahoma. The Cherokee Nation objected to this strategy, claiming that they had their own independent judicial and governmental structures. In the historic Worcester v. Georgia case, they even appealed to the Supreme Court, which upheld their right to self-governance. But, in 1838, the US government disregarded the decision.
Learn more about Cherokee here:
https://brainly.com/question/13839435
#SPJ4
How does the author illustrate Daisy's commitment to the Girl Scouts?
Title: DAISY LOW GROWS THE GIRL SCOUTS
What caused many African Americans to change their expectations regarding civil
rights after World War II?
Answer:
They had gained confidence to compete in a white-dominated society
Explanation:
theodore roosevelt's aggressive involvement in the panamanian revolt had the general international effect of
Theodore Roosevelt's aggressive involvement in the Panamanian revolt had the general international effect of making the United States appear powerful and imperialistic.
Following the Venezuelan crisis in 1902–1903, which saw the United States intervene in Venezuela to collect debts owed by European powers, Roosevelt was dedicated to preventing further European intervention in the Americas.
Roosevelt therefore urged the building of a canal through Central America and directed his agents to make agreements with local Panamanians who were interested in creating a republic separate from Colombia.
In 1903, the United States assisted in the separation of Panama from Colombia and guaranteed Panama's independence. Roosevelt quickly started work on the canal, which was completed in 1914.The Panamanian revolt was seen by the international community as a sign of United States power and imperialism.
This was because the United States assisted in the separation of Panama from Colombia and guaranteed Panama's independence. The United States was seen as the world's foremost imperial power at the time, and its involvement in the Panamanian revolt cemented this position.
Theodore Roosevelt's aggressive involvement in the Panamanian revolt made the United States appear powerful and imperialistic on the international stage.
Learn more about Panamanian revolt more:
brainly.com/question/13605571
#SPJ11
the extent to which the civil war led to changes in the united states economy in the period 1861-1900?
The Civil War significantly impacted the United States economy from 1861-1900, leading to a shift from agriculture to industry, the growth of railroads, the creation of a national banking system, the emancipation of slaves, and the development of corporations.
The main changes it led to include:
1. Shift from agriculture to industry: The war highlighted the need for a stronger industrial base in the United States. As a result, there was a shift from an agriculture-centered economy to a more industrialized one, particularly in the North.
2. Growth of railroads: To meet the demands of the war, the railroad system expanded rapidly, and by 1900, the United States had one of the most extensive railroad networks in the world. This helped facilitate trade, commerce, and the movement of people and goods across the country.
3. Creation of national banking system: The war also led to the creation of a national banking system to help finance the war effort. This helped stabilize the economy and provided a foundation for economic growth in the years that followed.
4. Emancipation of slaves: The Emancipation Proclamation and the 13th Amendment led to the abolition of slavery, which had a profound impact on the Southern economy. Freed slaves now had the opportunity to work for wages or become sharecroppers, while plantation owners had to adapt to new labor practices.
5. Reconstruction and economic development: Following the Civil War, the federal government initiated a period of Reconstruction in the South, which aimed to rebuild infrastructure, establish public education systems, and stimulate economic growth.
6. Growth of corporations: The late 19th century saw the rise of large corporations, which benefitted from the increased demand for manufactured goods during and after the Civil War. The growth of these corporations helped drive economic expansion and urbanization in the United States.
For more about Civil War:
https://brainly.com/question/11874600
#SPJ11
how did maggie walker use her business skills to help the black american community?
Maggie Lena Walker was an African-American instructor, money manager, and local area pioneer who helped her local area by giving instructive and monetary open doors to African Americans.
She developed the St. Luke Penny Reserve funds Bank in 1903, which gave advances and banking administrations to African Americans in Richmond, Virginia. She likewise filled in as the primary womanish director of a U.S. bank. She improved the Amazing Joined Request of St. Luke, a selfless affiliation outfitting protection, clinical consideration, and financial sponsorship to African
Americans. likewise, she was a forerunner in the Free Request of St. Luke, an African-American kind society, and improved the St. Luke Envoy, a survey outfitting news to African Americans.
Learn more about Maggie Lena Walker:
https://brainly.com/question/30827506
#SPJ4
Assume instead that the price of fedoras was $70 would there be a surplus or shortage how large would the surplus or shortage be
It depends on the quantity of fedoras that consumers are willing and able to buy at that price, as well as the quantity that producers are willing and able to sell at that price.
If the quantity of fedoras that consumers want to buy at $70 is greater than the quantity that producers are willing and able to sell at that price, then there would be a shortage of fedoras. This means that there would be excess demand for fedoras, and some consumers who want to buy fedoras would not be able to find them.
On the other hand, if the quantity of fedoras that producers are willing and able to sell at $70 is greater than the quantity that consumers want to buy at that price, then there would be a surplus of fedoras. This means that there would be excess supply of fedoras, and some producers who want to sell fedoras would not be able to find buyers.
Without knowing the specific quantities of demand and supply at $70, it is impossible to determine whether there would be a surplus or shortage, or how large it would be.
If the price of fedoras is $70, there would likely be a surplus. The size of the surplus would depend on the equilibrium price and the quantity demanded and supplied.
If the price of fedoras is $70, there would likely be a surplus. A surplus occurs when the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded at a given price. To determine the size of the surplus, we need more information such as the equilibrium price and the quantity demanded and supplied at that price.
For example, if the equilibrium price is $50 and the quantity demanded is 100 units while the quantity supplied at $70 is 150 units, then there would be a surplus of 50 units (150 - 100 = 50).
Learn more about surplus here:https://brainly.com/question/35248992
#SPJ2
explain justifications for imperialism, ideologies used to govern colonies and how colonized people responded to imperialism.
Imperialism can be defined as the extension of power, rule, or influence by one nation or people over another. Imperialism was largely driven by the desire for economic gain, geopolitical competition, and a desire to spread Western culture and values to other parts of the world.
Here is a more detailed answer on justifications for imperialism, ideologies used to govern colonies, and how colonized people responded to imperialism: Justifications for Imperialism was justified for several reasons, including the following:
1. Economic interests: Many European countries were struggling to meet their economic needs at home, and so imperialism provided an opportunity for them to access raw materials and markets in other parts of the world.
2. The spread of Western civilization: Imperial powers believed that their civilization was superior and had a moral duty to spread their culture, values, and religion to other parts of the world.
3. Nationalism: The desire to establish national prestige and power was also a significant factor in the rise of imperialism.
Ideologies used to govern colonies European colonialism was characterized by different ideologies that were used to govern colonies, including the following:
1. Paternalism: This ideology posited that the colonizers had a duty to educate and improve the lives of the colonized people.
2. Racism: This ideology held that the colonizers were superior to the colonized people, and so the latter needed to be governed for their own good.
3. Assimilation: This ideology held that the colonizers should aim to assimilate the colonized people into their culture and way of life.
How colonized people responded to imperialism Colonized people responded to imperialism in different ways, including the following:
1. Nationalism: Colonized people often developed a strong sense of national identity and fought for independence from their colonial overlords.
2. Resistance: Many colonized people resisted imperialism through guerrilla warfare, protests, and other forms of resistance.
3. Collaboration: Some colonized people collaborated with their colonial masters and benefited from the privileges of being part of the ruling class.
To know more about imperialism refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/1225474#
#SPJ11
What were Martin Luther’s religious views?
Answer:
Explanation:
Martin Luther’s thre main beliefs were faith in Jesus, not good works, brings salvation, the Bible is the final source for truth about God, not a church or its priests, and Lutheranism said that the church was made up of all its believers, not just the clergy.
theodore roosevelt broke with earlier presidential policy with his involvement to settle the:
Theodore Roosevelt broke with earlier presidential policy with his involvement to settle the Russo-Japanese War.
What is the Russo-Japanese War?
The Russo-Japanese War was a conflict that took place between the Russian Empire and the Empire of Japan from 1904 to 1905. It resulted in Japan's victory and established it as a military power in East Asia.How did Roosevelt mediate the Russo-Japanese War?Theodore Roosevelt, the President of the United States at the time, had been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1906 for his work in ending the Russo-Japanese War.
The United States was one of the few neutral countries, and Roosevelt acted as a mediator between the warring nations.To bring an end to the war, Roosevelt invited the delegations of both nations to a peace conference in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, in August 1905. The Treaty of Portsmouth was signed, ending the war and leaving Japan in a position of dominance in the Pacific.
This event marked the first time a non-European country had defeated a European power in a modern war. Theodore Roosevelt's involvement in mediating the Russo-Japanese War was a significant turning point in American diplomacy. He used his diplomatic skills to establish the United States as a key player in international affairs and demonstrated that the country could play a constructive role in resolving global conflicts.
To know more about Russo-Japanese War refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/27867091
#SPJ11
why does hamilton feel compelled to write about the character of the office of the executive (i.i., the presidency of the united states)?
Hamilton was compelled to write about the character of the executive office in the Federalist Papers because he believed that the presidency was crucial to the success of the new American government. Hamilton believed that a strong executive was necessary to ensure that the government was effective and that the rights of citizens were protected. He also believed that the executive should have a significant amount of power to be able to carry out its duties effectively.
The Federalist Papers were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to promote the ratification of the United States Constitution. Hamilton wrote the majority of the papers and devoted a considerable amount of time and effort to explaining the role of the executive branch.
Hamilton believed that the president should be able to make decisions quickly and effectively and that the office of the presidency should be respected and revered by the people. He also believed that the president should be able to exercise significant control over foreign affairs and that the presidency should be able to act as a check on the power of the legislative and judicial branches.
In short, Hamilton felt compelled to write about the character of the executive office because he believed that a strong and effective executive was necessary to ensure the success of the American government. The Federalist Papers remain an essential document for understanding the philosophy behind the American government and the role of the presidency.
To learn more about Hamilton here:
https://brainly.com/question/31006348
#SPJ11
after the thirteenth century, what was one key difference between the political practices and governing principles of england compared to the continental europeans?
In the 13th century, England began to develop its own political practices and governing principles which differed from those of continental Europeans.
England differed from the continental Europeans in its political practices and governing principles in several ways. The following is one of the most significant differences: The powers of the monarchs and parliaments. The key difference between England and the continental Europeans in political practices and governing principles after the thirteenth century was the powers of the monarchs and parliaments.
In contrast to the monarchs of continental Europe, English monarchs, through parliament, established their powers. The English monarchs' powers were always limited by parliament's regulations, and the parliament became an essential part of the English governance system. King John was compelled to accept the Magna Carta, which established the English parliament, and the powers of the English monarchs were always limited by the parliament's rules. Therefore, after the thirteenth century, the English governance system distinguished from the continental European governance system in the powers of the monarchs and parliaments.
To know more about English governance click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/20801055#
#SPJ11