One significant argument for the existence of a conspiracy involving the Watergate Scandal is the level of involvement of high-ranking officials in the Nixon administration.
The break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate Building was initially thought to have been the work of low-level operatives. However, as the investigation progressed, it became clear that senior White House officials, including Attorney General John Mitchell and White House Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, were involved, suggesting a broader plot.
Additionally, the discovery of secret recordings by President Nixon indicated that he was aware of the break-in and had attempted to cover it up. This level of involvement at the highest levels of government suggests that the break-in was not an isolated incident but rather a coordinated effort, pointing towards the possibility of a larger conspiracy.
Learn more about Conspiracy here:
https://brainly.com/question/14307903
#SPJ1
Which of these physical features runs through many states?
A:Appalachian Mountains B:Lake Okeechobee C:Salton Sea D:Stone Mountain
Your task for this assessment is to evaluate the perspective of a person living in the 1800s and how their traditions changed because of the Industrial Revolution. You will need to complete the chart about what life was like before the Industrial Revolution and what life was like after the Industrial Revolution. In each category you will need to write 3–4 complete sentences explaining how life changed in each category.
Before the Industrial Revolution, life in the 1800s was centered around an agrarian economy where farming and small-scale craftsmanship were prevalent. The economy was localized, with limited trade and commerce.
Life Before the Industrial Revolution:
1. Economy: Before the Industrial Revolution, the economy was primarily agrarian and based on farming and small-scale craftsmanship. People relied on subsistence agriculture, producing their own food and goods within their local communities.
2. Work and Labor: The majority of work was done in small-scale workshops or on family farms. Craftsmen and artisans produced goods by hand, using traditional methods and tools.
3. Technology and Production: Technological advancements were limited, with simple tools and machinery used in agricultural practices and artisanal production.
Life After the Industrial Revolution:
1. Economy: The Industrial Revolution brought about a significant shift from an agrarian economy to an industrialized one. Mass production in factories became the norm, and the use of machinery, such as steam engines, led to increased productivity.
2. Work and Labor: The Industrial Revolution introduced mechanization and the factory system, leading to a transformation in the nature of work. Labor became more specialized and focused on operating machines rather than skilled craftsmanship.
3. Technology and Production: The advent of steam power and the mechanization of production processes revolutionized manufacturing.
In conclusion, the Industrial Revolution fundamentally transformed 1800s society, shifting it from an agrarian-based economy to an industrialized one, revolutionizing work, production, and communication.
For more such questions on Industrial Revolution:
https://brainly.com/question/14240244
#SPJ8
what was the reslution in Germany about how Jewish were treated and laws and final solution
The treatment of Jews and the passing of legislation that marginalized and persecuted them over the course of the Nazi era in Germany went through numerous stages.
These laws, along with the Final Solution, had no justifiable legal or moral justifications and were instead a component of a planned, state-sponsored genocide. We now have a far clearer picture of these awful events because of historical research and documentation that followed the post-war Nuremberg Trials, which confirmed the Nazi leaders' criminal guilt for these atrocities.
There were several phases to how Jews were treated during the Nazi era in Germany, and laws that marginalized and punished them were passed.
Learn more about Germany here:
https://brainly.com/question/1061130
#SPJ1
Which statement is an accurate summary of a difference between the
Preamble and the first three articles of the Constitution?
1 of 4 QUESTIONS
The Preamble argues in favor of natural rights, while the articles explain
the relationship between the states and the federal government
The Preamble explains the structure of the government, while the articles
identify individual rights protected by the government.
The Preamble identifies the source of the document's authority, while the
articles specify the structure of the government.
The Preamble identifies the kind of government the United States wants
to have, while the articles offer reasons to support it.
The statement "The Preamble identifies the kind of government the United States wants to have, while the articles offer reasons to support it" accurately summarizes a difference between the Preamble and the first three articles of the Constitution. Therefore, the 4th statement is the most accurate summary.
The statement "The Preamble identifies the kind of government the United States wants to have, while the articles offer reasons to support it" accurately summarizes a difference between the Preamble and the first three articles of the Constitution. The Preamble sets the overall tone and purpose of the Constitution by outlining the goals and aspirations of the government. It expresses the ideals of the Founding Fathers and establishes the principles upon which the government is based. On the other hand, the first three articles of the Constitution delve into the practical aspects of governance. They outline the structure and powers of the different branches of government, establish the relationship between the states and the federal government, and define the roles and responsibilities of each branch. While the Preamble provides a vision for the government, the articles focus on the mechanics and operations of how that government will function. Therefore, the 4th statement i.e.,"The Preamble identifies the kind of government the United States wants to have, while the articles offer reasons to support it" is the most accurate summary.For more such questions on Preamble:
https://brainly.com/question/1700667
#SPJ8
I need a short answer for each persons ideas of government, Then identify which one’s ideas of government did not inspire the French people to revolt in 1789: Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, Montesquieu, and Karl Marx
I really need help
Karl Marx's ideas of government, centered around socialism and the abolition of private property, did not play a significant role in inspiring the French people to revolt in 1789.
Thomas Jefferson's ideas of government emphasized democratic principles, individual rights, and limited government power.John Locke's ideas of government focused on natural rights, social contract theory, and the consent of the governed.Montesquieu's ideas of government advocated for the separation of powers, checks and balances, and a system of constitutional governance.Karl Marx's ideas of government centered around socialism, the abolition of private property, and a classless society.Out of these thinkers, Karl Marx's ideas of government did not inspire the French people to revolt in 1789. The French Revolution of 1789 was primarily influenced by the ideas of Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, and Montesquieu, which emphasized concepts such as popular sovereignty, individual rights, and constitutional governance. Marx's ideas gained more prominence in the later 19th and 20th centuries, but they were not a driving force behind the initial French Revolution.
In conclusion, while the ideas of Thomas Jefferson, John Locke, and Montesquieu influenced the French people's revolt in 1789 with their emphasis on democratic principles, individual rights, and constitutional governance, Karl Marx's ideas did not play a significant role in inspiring the French Revolution.
For more such questions on Karl Marx:
https://brainly.com/question/31453767
#SPJ8
write how a writer uses different elements to express a point of view
A writer employs various elements of writing in their work to effectively express their point of view such as language, tone, imagery, symbolism, characterization, and narrative structure, work in harmony to convey the writer's perspective, and engage the reader in a thought-provoking manner.
Language plays a vital role in shaping the writer's point of view. The choice of words, sentence structure, and figurative language all contribute to conveying a particular perspective. Tone is another element that reflects the writer's point of view. It refers to the attitude or emotional disposition of the writer towards the subject matter. Imagery is an element of writing that allows the writer to create vivid mental pictures and sensory experiences in the reader's mind. By using descriptive and evocative language, the writer can appeal to the reader's senses and enhance their understanding and emotional connection to the point of view being expressed. Symbolism is a powerful tool used by writers to convey abstract or complex ideas. For instance, a recurring symbol of a butterfly may represent transformation and freedom, suggesting the writer's belief in personal growth and liberation.Characterization is another crucial element in expressing a point of view. By creating well-developed and relatable characters, a writer can embody different perspectives and allow the reader to experience the world through their eyes.Narrative structure and storytelling techniques also contribute to expressing a point of view. The way a story is structured, whether it is linear, nonlinear, or fragmented, can influence the reader's interpretation and understanding of the writer's perspective.In conclusion, a writer skillfully employs various elements, including language, tone, imagery, symbolism, characterization, and narrative structure, to express their point of view. By utilizing these elements effectively, writers can engage readers, evoke emotions, and provoke thought, leaving a lasting impression of their perspective on the audience.
For more such questions on elements of writing:
https://brainly.com/question/30340818
#SPJ8
who believed power should not be concentrated in the hands of on invididuals
Answer: John Locke believed power should not be concentrated in the hands of one individual . Charles de Montesquieu also held a similar view, declaring that power should not be concentrated in the hands of any one individual and that a government elected by the people was preferable . This idea is also reflected in the US Constitution, which established a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
What city became the symbol of the separation of communism and democracy in Europe, including a famous wall and airlift, and a key area of containment for the Democratic powers?
A
Dublin
B
Paris
C
Stalingrad
D
Berlin
7. Which part of the Compromise of 1850 shown in the diagram was most likely demanded by southern members of Congress?
The most likely part of the Compromise of 1850 demanded by southern members of Congress was the Fugitive Slave Act.[tex]\huge{\mathcal{\colorbox{black}{\textcolor{lime}{\textsf{I hope this helps !}}}}}[/tex]
♥️ [tex]\large{\textcolor{red}{\underline{\texttt{SUMIT ROY (:}}}}[/tex]
2.10 Module Project: Museum Exhibit on Feudalism in Western Europe and Japan
Name:
Date/Teacher:
Choose five specific "artifacts" from the information covered in the module. You should definitely capture the feudal system in some way, the significance of the Church and the Crusades, the beginning of nationalism, and of course at least one artifact from Japan.
Artifact 1:
(Your artifacts do not have to be physical objects; they can be something intangible, like a law or a belief, a person or group of people, or an event)
Lesson (ex 2.03):
Description-
Who:
What:
When:
Where:
Explanation-
Your explanation should be at least two sentences and explain the historical significance of the artifact and why you feel the artifact important enough to be included in your exhibit (Why). Consider the following in your explanation: did the artifact a) change the way people did things, b) change the way people thought about themselves and their world, or c) change the course of history?
Artifact 2:
(Your artifacts do not have to be physical objects; they can be something intangible, like a law or a belief, a person or group of people, or an event)
Lesson (ex 2.03):
Description-
Who:
What:
When:
Where:
Explanation-
Your explanation should be at least two sentences and explain the historical significance of the artifact and why you feel the artifact important enough to be included in your exhibit (Why). Consider the following in your explanation: did the artifact a) change the way people did things, b) change the way people thought about themselves and their world, or c) change the course of history?
Artifact 3:
(Your artifacts do not have to be physical objects; they can be something intangible, like a law or a belief, a person or group of people, or an event)
Lesson (ex 2.03):
Description-
Who:
What:
When:
Where:
Explanation-
Your explanation should be at least two sentences and explain the historical significance of the artifact and why you feel the artifact important enough to be included in your exhibit (Why). Consider the following in your explanation: did the artifact a) change the way people did things, b) change the way people thought about themselves and their world, or c) change the course of history?
Artifact 4:
(Your artifacts do not have to be physical objects; they can be something intangible, like a law or a belief, a person or group of people, or an event)
Lesson (ex 2.03):
Description-
Who:
What:
When:
Where:
Explanation-
Your explanation should be at least two sentences and explain the historical significance of the artifact and why you feel the artifact important enough to be included in your exhibit (Why). Consider the following in your explanation: did the artifact a) change the way people did things, b) change the way people thought about themselves and their world, or c) change the course of history?
Artifact 5:
(Your artifacts do not have to be physical objects; they can be something intangible, like a law or a belief, a person or group of people, or an event)
Lesson (ex 2.03):
Description-
Who:
What:
When:
Where:
Explanation-
Your explanation should be at least two sentences and explain the historical significance of the artifact and why you feel the artifact important enough to be included in your exhibit (Why). Consider the following in your explanation: did the artifact a) change the way people did things, b) change the way people thought about themselves and their world, or c) change the course of history?
Artifact 1
Description: The Magna Carta
Who: King John of England
What: A document that limited the power of the king and established the principle of rule of law
When: 1215
Where: Runnymede, England
How to explain the artifactThe Magna Carta was a major turning point in English history. It limited the power of the king and established the principle of rule of law. This had a profound impact on the way people thought about government and the rights of individuals. The Magna Carta is still considered one of the most important documents in Western history.
Artifact 2
Description: The Crusades
Who: Christians from Europe
What: A series of religious wars between Christians and Muslims
When: 1095-1291
Where: The Middle East
The Crusades were a major turning point in European history. They helped to spread Christianity to the Middle East and to unite Europe against a common enemy. The Crusades also had a profound impact on the way people thought about religion and the role of violence in society.
Artifact 3
Description: The Hundred Years' War
Who: France and England
What: A series of wars between France and England over the French throne
When: 1337-1453
Where: France and England
The Hundred Years' War was a major turning point in European history. It helped to establish France as a major power in Europe and to weaken the power of England. The Hundred Years' War also had a profound impact on the way people thought about war and the role of the military in society.
Artifact 4
Description: The rise of nationalism
Who: People from all over Europe
What: A movement that emphasized the importance of national identity and unity
When: 1500-1800
Where: Europe
The rise of nationalism was a major turning point in European history. It helped to create the modern nation-state and to lead to the decline of the feudal system. The rise of nationalism also had a profound impact on the way people thought about themselves and their place in the world.
Artifact 5
Description: The Tale of Genji
Who: Murasaki Shikibu
What: A novel written by a Japanese woman
When: 11th century
Where: Japan
The Tale of Genji is a major work of Japanese literature. It is considered one of the first novels ever written and is a masterpiece of storytelling. The Tale of Genji had a profound impact on the way people thought about literature and the role of women in society.
Learn more about art on
https://brainly.com/question/1504175
#SPJ1
strategies to avoid mass tourism damage to the icon machu picchu
Answer:1. provide awareness to tourists
2. tighten existing laws
Explanation:
1. provide awareness to tourists
give awareness to tourists about how valuable the historical place is and how important it is for them not to damage the place
2. tighten existing laws
The government needs to tighten the law about damage that occurs in historical places such as fines and prisons
3. increase the number of guardians
hire more workers to maintain the building
In this excerpt, James Cross Giblin characterizes Thomas Young through his words. his actions his reactions. his conversations.
In this excerpt, James Cross Giblin portrays Thomas Young by showcasing his words, actions, reactions, and conversations.
Young's dialogue reveals his deep curiosity and passion for learning, evident in his studies of various subjects like languages and natural philosophy. His actions, such as successfully decoding hieroglyphics on the Rosetta Stone, demonstrate his commitment to his work. Young's responses to challenges, like the ridicule from a fellow scientist, exhibit his determination and resilience. Furthermore, his interactions with fellow scholars highlight his collaborative and open-minded nature. Together, these elements construct a vivid depiction of Thomas Young as an enthusiastic and accomplished intellectual. His relentless pursuit of deciphering ancient scripts and his unwavering dedication to his scholarly pursuits further illustrate his brilliance and tenacity.Therefore, it can be said that James Cross Giblin portrays Thomas Young by showcasing his words, actions, reactions, and conversations.
For more such questions on Thomas Young:
https://brainly.com/question/16114877
#SPJ8
What do think it means that "their divine mandate was to civilize the native population"? Put this in your own words.
The statement implies that a certain group believed they had a divine duty to civilize and assimilate the indigenous population into their own culture.
To put it in my own words, the phrase "their divine mandate was to civilize the native population" suggests that a particular group or entity believed they had a sacred or higher purpose to educate and assimilate the indigenous population into their own culture or way of life. It implies that those who held this belief considered themselves superior and entrusted with a mission to bring progress and civilization to those they deemed as "native." This viewpoint often arose during historical periods of colonization or imperialism when dominant powers justified their actions by asserting a moral or religious duty to impose their values and customs onto indigenous communities. However, it is important to recognize that such perspectives have been criticized for disregarding the rights, autonomy, and rich cultural heritage of native populations.Hence, it can be said that a certain group believed they had a divine duty to civilize and assimilate the indigenous population into their own culture.
For more such questions on indigenous population:
https://brainly.com/question/367033
#SPJ8
what is containment
The Cold War saw the United States pursuing a containment strategy in an effort to stop the spread of communism following the conclusion of World War II.
In 1947, George F. Kennan introduced the concept of containment, which later evolved into the main plan of action for the United States in its conflict with the Soviet Union.
Containment was an approach that fell somewhere in between rollback and détente (actively overthrowing a regime). The Cold War and U.S. foreign policy during that time were significantly shaped by the containment strategy.
As a result, the significance of the containment in the Cold War are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Cold War, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12698715
#SPJ1
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
What is containment in the Cold War?
PLEASE HELP TIMED- 60 pts!!!
_________________________
You are E.W. Marlin's campaign manager and you have the task of creating a brochure that will be shared
with voters to help get Mr. Marlin elected to the U.S. Senate. Use the sources provided to help you create
the brochure using this template.
The Brochure that is focus on meeting social and economic needs is given below
What is the BrochureE.W. Marlin believes education transforms lives. He will push for more education funding and accessibility, equipping everyone to succeed in the workforce. Protecting Healthcare: E.W. Marlin is committed to healthcare for all. He will strive to enhance healthcare programs, broaden Medicaid, and achieve inclusive healthcare reform for all.
Income Equality: E.W. Marlin believes in a just society. He supports reducing income inequality, raising the minimum wage, and promoting worker protections to help individuals and families achieve financial stability.
Learn more about Brochure from
https://brainly.com/question/30657309
#SPJ1
This 1989 photograph symbolizes the
A
end of the Cold War
B
importance of the Berlin airlift
C
creation of a divided Germany
D
fear of Nazism among Germans
Answer:A
Explanation:This 1989 photograph symbolizes the end of the Cold War.
Correct option is (A)This 1989 photograph symbolizes the end of the Cold War.
A. End of the Cold War: This option is highly likely. The photograph could symbolize the end of the Cold War, which refers to the period of political tension and hostility between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Cold War was characterized by the division of Europe into Eastern and Western blocs,physical separation between East and West Germany.
B. Importance of the Berlin Airlift: The Berlin Airlift, which occurred from 1948 to 1949, was a massive humanitarian and logistical effort to supply West Berlin with food, fuel, and other essentials during the Soviet blockade. While the photograph might not directly symbolize the Berlin Airlift, it could indirectly in terms of the determination to support West Berlin and maintain freedom and democracy.
C. Creation of a Divided Germany: The photograph might also symbolize the creation of a divided Germany, specifically the physical division between East and West Germany during the Cold War. This division was marked by the construction of the Berlin Wall in 1961. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 signaled the beginning of the process towards the reunification of Germany.
D. fear of Nazism among Germans:The fear of Nazism among Germans can be understood in the context of Germany's historical experience with the Nazi regime under Adolf Hitler from 1933 to 1945.
for similar questions on Cold War.
https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ8
What is the message of this picture? good details
The message in this picture is that big bureaucrats and capitalists are having a discussion at the table where all big names are involved.
A collection of non-elected government representatives or an administrative policy-making body is known as a bureaucracy. A bureaucracy, historically, was a form of government administration where departments were run by non-elected people. Any significant organization today, whether it is privately or publicly held, is governed by bureaucracy.
Bureaucracy is exemplified by the public administration in many jurisdictions and sub-jurisdictions, but it may also be seen in any organization with a centralized hierarchical structure, such as hospitals, academic institutions, commercial businesses, professional societies, social clubs, etc. Bureaucracy faces two main problems. The first conundrum is the question of whether bureaucrats should be independent or directly answerable to their political masters.
Learn more about bureaucrats here:
https://brainly.com/question/10477130
#SPJ1
How have income taxes influenced some people in the United States over time?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A) They have caused people that make more money to pay more taxes.
(B) They have forced the government to provide fewer services to people.
(C) They have led to the creation of products that are less safe.
(D) They have made it cheaper to buy goods and services.
Answer:
The correct answer is:
(A) They have caused people that make more money to pay more taxes.
Explanation:
Income taxes have caused people that make more money to pay more taxes. This is because income taxes are progressive, meaning that the higher your income, the higher your tax rate. This is designed to ensure that everyone pays their fair share of taxes, and that the wealthy contribute more to the government than the poor.
Income taxes have had a significant impact on people in the United States over time. They have helped to fund important government programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. They have also helped to reduce income inequality and promote economic growth.
However, income taxes can also be a burden on individuals and businesses. They can discourage investment and job creation, and they can make it more difficult for people to save for retirement.
Overall, income taxes are a complex issue with both positive and negative effects. It is important to weigh the pros and cons of income taxes carefully before making a decision about whether or not they are a good thing.
According to the chart, what happened from June 1610 to December 1610?
A.
population decreased due to disease and attacks
B.
Indian population increased due to settlers leaving
C.
population increased due to new arrivals
D.
population increased due to disease and attacks
According to the chart, the population decreased due to disease and attacks from June 1610 to December 1610. Thus, option A is the correct option.
"The starving time" was the winner of 1609–1610, when food shortages, a disjointed leadership, and a siege by Powhatan Indian warriors resulted in the deaths of two out of every three colonists at James Fort. The colony struggled right away to keep a supply of food.
A prolonged seven-year drought that put a burden on food supplies for everyone in the area caused trade relations with the Virginia Indian tribes to become strained. In the first two years of the colony, Captain John Smith had some success bartering European goods for grain, but his strongarm methods also infuriated the native populations.
Learn more about The starving time here:
https://brainly.com/question/27967820
#SPJ1
What was a characteristic of Johnson's plan for Reconstruction?
Johnson's plan also called for the loyalty of 10% of the men who voted in the 1860 election. Furthermore, the plan called for amnesty and the return of people's property if they pledged to be loyal to the United States.
President Andrew Johnson implemented a Reconstruction plan in 1865 that gave the white South complete control over the transition from slavery to freedom and gave blacks no role in Southern politics. Many Northerners opposed the president's policies due to the behaviour of the governments he established. At the end of the Civil War, the country lacked a clear Reconstruction policy.
President Andrew Johnson granted pardons to all white Southerners except Confederate leaders and wealthy planters in May 1865 (though most of these later received individual pardons), allowing them to form new governments.
Learn more about Johnson, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29785672
#SPJ1
Which of the following new pieces of technology most directly caused the trench warfare of the Western Front of World War I?
Machine guns
O Poison gas
O Airplanes
O Tanks
The technology that most directly caused the trench warfare of the Western Front of World War I was the Option A. machine gun.
The introduction of the machine gun revolutionized warfare during this time. It had the ability to fire hundreds of rounds per minute and could mow down large numbers of soldiers with devastating accuracy. This meant that soldiers advancing toward the enemy were met with a hail of bullets, making it extremely difficult to cross open ground without sustaining heavy casualties. As a result, armies on the Western Front were forced to dig trenches for protection.
The machine gun created a stalemate on the Western Front, as both sides were well-entrenched and had a network of trenches stretching for hundreds of miles. This led to a static war where neither side could gain significant ground. The machine gun made it nearly impossible for attacking forces to break through the defensive lines of the enemy.
Other technologies such as poison gas, airplanes, and tanks were also used during World War I, but they did not have the same direct impact on trench warfare as the machine gun. Poison gas was horrific and caused widespread suffering, but it did not fundamentally change the nature of the war. Airplanes were used for reconnaissance and bombing, but they did not play a major role in trench warfare itself. Tanks were introduced later in the war and had the potential to break through enemy lines, but they were not initially used in large enough numbers to significantly alter the course of the war.
In summary, the machine gun was the technology that most directly caused trench warfare on the Western Front of World War I. Its ability to rapidly fire bullets and mow down soldiers made it extremely difficult for attacking forces to advance, resulting in the static and defensive nature of trench warfare. Therefore, the correct option is A.
Know more about World War I here:
https://brainly.com/question/27326515
#SPJ8
The question was incomplete, Find the full content below:
Which of the following new pieces of technology most directly caused the trench warfare of the Western Front of World War I?
A. Machine guns
B. Poison gas
C. Airplanes
D. Tanks
Did all members of the jepanese mulitary feel that the attack was necessary? Why or why not?
Where is Hoodoo practiced?
Answer: Africa
Explanation: Hoodoo is a set of magickal practices originating in Africa which, through the process of syncretism, has absorbed some beliefs and practices from other cultures such as Native American spirituality and European Ceremonial Magick. In some cases, the word hoodoo can also refer to
The document “PRO: What Was Really Great About The Great Society” by Joseph A.Califano Jr.”
Document 2: “CON: War on Poverty Revisited” by Thomas Sowell
PLEASE HELP ASAP
Pro: What The Great Society Really Had to Offer, by Joseph A. Califano Jr. I don't have any precise information regarding current articles or essays, and my training data only extends until September 2021. The publication of the paper you described may have occurred after my knowledge threshold.
American lawyer, lecturer, and public servant Joseph Anthony Califano Jr. was born on May 15, 1931. His contributions to the development of welfare policy in the administrations of Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson and Jimmy Carter, as well as his time as the Carter administration's Secretary of training data Health, Education, and Welfare,
have made him well-known. Additionally, Califano founded and served as chairman of The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University
Learn more about Califano , from :
brainly.com/question/4372023
#SPJ1
Select the correct answer
What was one reason that the Radical Republicans in Congress opposed President Andrew Johnson's Reconstruction plan?
Answer:
A
Explanation:
i just did the assignment
What was the cause of european exploration and the columbian exchange
What were the Great Purges?
A
Mass executions of those who opposed or were accused of opposing totalitarian rule in the Soviet Union
B
Removal of large numbers of Jewish citizens out of the Soviet Union
C
The mass migration of almost 10 million people out of the Soviet Union after World War I
D
The movement by the Soviet people to remove anything anti-Russian from the country
Option(A) is the correct Answer.
Mass executions of those who opposed or were accused of opposing totalitarian rule in the Soviet Union.
The Great Purges, also known as the Great Terror, refer to a period of widespread political repression and mass executions that occurred in the Soviet Union during the late 1930s.
The purges were carried out under the leadership of Joseph Stalin and targeted individuals who were perceived as threats to his rule or accused of opposing the totalitarian regime.
During this time, many high-ranking officials, intellectuals, military officers, and members of the Communist Party were arrested, imprisoned, and often executed after show trials.
The purges extended to various sectors of society, including the military, government, academia, and even ordinary citizens. The accusations against the victims were often based on fabricated charges of sabotage, espionage, treason, and other political crimes.
for similar questions on Mass executions.
https://brainly.com/question/28916084
#SPJ8
on a point of viewhow a writer from triumphs and troubles express different elements
How might the Christian Bible have had an impact on the lives of enslaved persons?
They could earn freedom by converting to Christianity.
Some felt they could relate to stories of suffering in the Bible.
Most enslaved children learned basic reading and math skills.
Marriages could stop a slaveholder from separating families.
The Warsaw Pact was developed in 1955 as a response to the
A
formation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization.
B
start of the communist revolution in Cuba.
C
U.S. development of the hydrogen bomb.
D
UN intervention in Korea.
What was the Warsaw pact? The Warsaw fact was a military alliance between all of the communist east European countries, headed by the Soviet Union in 1955. It was designed as a response to NATO. Members were to support each other if attacked.
The Soviet Union formed this alliance as a counterbalance to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), a collective security alliance concluded between the United States, Canada and Western European nations in 1949. The Warsaw Pact supplemented existing agreements.