The unconditional surrender of Germany in the Atlantic theater and Japan in the Pacific theater was a critical step in ending World War II. It was important that both nations surrender unconditionally to ensure a decisive and lasting victory, preventing future conflicts.
An unconditional surrender is when one side completely and irrevocably surrenders to another, with no conditions or negotiations. The Allies required this of both Germany and Japan to avoid prolonging the war, as well as to avoid setting any preconditions for further aggression by either country.
Additionally, an unconditional surrender prevented the possibility of a separate peace between the Allies and either Germany or Japan, which could have disrupted the unity of the Allies. This would have made it more difficult to enforce post-war peace treaties and to bring the war to a lasting conclusion.
Moreover, an unconditional surrender prevented both Germany and Japan from demanding any sort of reparations for war damages. Without such a surrender, the Allies would have been forced to negotiate over how to pay for damages inflicted during the war, potentially leading to further conflicts.
In short, the Allies required unconditional surrender from both Germany and Japan in order to ensure a decisive victory, avoid prolonged warfare, maintain the unity of the Allies, and avoid the potential for further conflict.
To know more about unconditional surrender of Germany and Japan refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/9626708
#SPJ11
how did early people sustain themselves before the invention of the agriculture?
Answer: Before farming, people lived by hunting wild animals and gathering wild plants. When supplies ran out, these hunter-gatherers moved on to another location.
Explanation:
the immigration and nationality acts amendments, beginning in 1965, had what kind of impact on california's immigration?
The Immigration and Nationality Acts Amendments of 1965 had a significant impact on California's immigration.
These amendments removed the previous discriminatory policies in place that favored immigrants from certain countries, and instead replaced them with a system that was based on a person's skills and family reunification.
This allowed for a greater influx of diverse immigrants from all parts of the world, thus increasing the diversity of the population of California.
The Immigration and Nationality Acts Amendments of 1965 significantly changed the landscape of immigration to the state of California.
These amendments ended the discriminatory quota system that favored immigrants from certain countries, and instead replaced it with a system based on the skills of the applicant and family reunification.
This allowed a greater number of immigrants to enter the state, including those from countries that had previously been under-represented in the population.
This increase in diversity allowed California to become a melting pot of cultures and ideas, and opened the door for economic growth and opportunity. The Immigration and Nationality Acts Amendments of 1965 therefore had a huge impact on California's immigration.
To know more about discriminatory policies click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30650257#
#SPJ11
NAFTA links countries:
with the same language.
in the same region.
that follow the same religion.
that export the same resource.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
the primary reason that president warren g. harding was willing to seize the initiative on the issue of international disarmament was that
The primary reason why President Warren G. Harding was willing to seize the initiative on the issue of international disarmament was that he saw it as a means to establish the United States as a world leader.
Disarmament is the process of reducing or eliminating military weapons and equipment that are used in war or combat. It is a multilateral process that involves several countries and often includes the exchange of information and technology, as well as diplomatic negotiations and agreements.
The aim of disarmament is to create a more peaceful world and to prevent the use of weapons of mass destruction by rogue states and terrorist groups.
The purpose of the 1921-22 Washington Naval Conference was to establish a framework for disarmament and arms limitation in the Pacific region. The conference was initiated by President Warren G. Harding, who saw it as a means to establish the United States as a world leader and to promote peace and stability in the region.
The conference resulted in the signing of several agreements, including the Four-Power Treaty, the Five-Power Treaty, and the Nine-Power Treaty, which set limits on naval armaments and established guidelines for international diplomacy and trade.
To know more about Disarmament here:
https://brainly.com/question/29766422#
#SPJ11
All of the following were goals of Octavian EXCEPT
a. Strengthen family values
c. Conquer norther Africa
b. Keep the peace
d. Promote prosperity
He understood that Rome needed work for the unemployed, stability, and an end to civil warfare. These targets were met by Octavian.
What were goals of Octavian?
Octavian (Augustus Caesar), the first emperor of Rome (63 B.C.–A.D. 14), is most remembered for establishing the Pax Romana, a generally calm period of two centuries during which Rome imposed order on a world that had been torn apart by battle for a long time. Yet, his ascent to power was anything from tranquil. Augustus was an organizational genius who outperformed his military triumphs in the administrative sphere. By upholding institutions like the Senate and issuing laws that looked to be in keeping with the principles of the Roman Republic, he allayed the citizens' worries of another dictatorship.
Caesar Augustus, usually known as Octavian, was the first Roman emperor. He ruled from 27 BC until his death on August 19, AD 14. His birth name was Gaius Octavius, and he passed away on August 19, AD 14.
Learn more about goals of Octavian:
https://brainly.com/question/12715699
#SPJ1
Was a protest over federal tax, washington used domestic force to stop the uprising?
Whiskey Rebellion of 1791-1794, occurred in response to an excise tax on whiskey imposed by the newly formed federal government under President George Washington.
In 1794, after several years of protests and violence by farmers and distillers in western Pennsylvania, Washington ordered the mobilization of a federal army of 13,000 troops to quell the rebellion. The use of force was successful, and the rebels dispersed without significant bloodshed.
This event demonstrated the federal government's willingness to use domestic force to enforce its laws and maintain order, as well as its ability to do so effectively. However, it also sparked debates about the appropriate balance between federal power and state sovereignty, and the role of taxation in American society.
To learn more about federal government follow the link:
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ4
in what ways did the colonizers of the late nineteenth century control the indigenous peoples and increase economic exploitation?
The colonizers of the late nineteenth century controlled the indigenous peoples and increase economic exploitation by forced labor, land grabbing, violence and repression.
The following are some of the ways:
Forced Labor: The colonizers used forced labor to exploit the indigenous peoples. The indigenous people were forced to work in the plantations, mines, and other workplaces owned by the colonizers.
Land Grabbing: The colonizers seized the land owned by the indigenous peoples and claimed it as their own. This forced the indigenous people to move to the marginal lands, which were less fertile and suitable for farming. The colonizers used the fertile lands to grow crops for exportation, which generated high revenues.
Violence and Repression: The colonizers used violence and repression to control the indigenous peoples. They imposed strict laws that restricted the movements and activities of the indigenous people. The violence and repression intimidated the indigenous people, making them obedient and easy to control.
Know more about indigenous peoples here:
https://brainly.com/question/30293439
#SPJ11
compare and contrast the positions of washington and du bois on the issue of civil rights for african americans. how were they similar, how were they different?
Washington and Du Bois held different positions and beliefs on civil rights for African Americans.
While Washington believed that African Americans could earn civil rights by improving their economic status, Du Bois advocated for immediate political and social equality for African Americans. They had some similarities as well.
Washington's position on African Americans and their civil rights was that they should focus on economic advancement rather than immediate political or social equality. He believed that by becoming financially successful, African Americans would gain respect from the white community and eventually earn civil rights.
Washington also believed that African Americans should not openly challenge segregation and discrimination but should rather work within the existing system to improve their lives.
Du Bois, on the other hand, believed that immediate political and social equality for African Americans was necessary to end racism and discrimination. He advocated for African Americans to have the right to vote, receive equal education, and have equal opportunities for employment.
Du Bois also believed that African Americans should openly challenge segregation and racism rather than working within the system.
Washington and Du Bois shared some similarities in their positions.
Both believed that education was crucial for the advancement of African Americans. Washington founded the Tuskegee Institute, which provided vocational training to African Americans. Similarly, Du Bois believed in the importance of education and was a strong advocate for African Americans to receive equal education opportunities.
In conclusion, Washington and Du Bois held different positions on civil rights for African Americans, but they both shared a belief in the importance of education for African American advancement. Washington focused on economic advancement, while Du Bois advocated for immediate political and social equality.
To know more about African Americans, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/24318057#
#SPJ11
the romans contributed aspects of their history to the foundations of american government. what are these aspects? (choose all that apply)
The Romans contributed several aspects of their history to the foundations of American government. These aspects include separation of powers, rule of law, public office, written law codes, representative government, and the concept of citizenship.
Separation of Powers refers to the concept of having three branches of government – the executive, legislative, and judicial branches – that all have separate and independent powers and responsibilities. This is designed to prevent any one branch from having too much power.
The Rule of Law states that all citizens and government officials must obey the law and are held accountable for their actions, regardless of their status or power. This is to prevent the arbitrary exercise of authority by government officials.
Public office refers to public service positions held by officials, who are appointed or elected to represent the people. These officials are held accountable to the people, and are expected to fulfill their duties with integrity.
Written Law Codes refer to the written laws that dictate the acceptable and unacceptable behaviors for citizens and government officials. This ensures that the law is followed consistently and fairly.
Representative government is the system of government in which citizens have the right to elect representatives to act on their behalf. This gives citizens a voice in government decision-making, as well as the ability to hold their representatives accountable for their actions.
Citizenship is the concept of being a member of a nation or state. Citizens have certain rights, privileges, and responsibilities, which is designed to promote a sense of community and connection among members.
To know more about Romans refer here :
https://brainly.com/question/17749003
#SPJ11
Which is the most likely reason that enslaved people were forbidden to learn how to read and write
A. To keep them focused on music instead
B. To keep them from moving on to better jobs
C. To show them that education was not important
D. To prevent them from acquiring ideas about freedom
D. The most likely reason enslaved people were forbidden to learn to read and write was to prevent them from developing ideas about freedom.
Why didn't slaves have the ability to read and write?In many colonies, whites enacted laws that prohibited slaves from learning to read and write and made it a crime for others to teach them. They were concerned that black literacy would pose a threat to the slave system, which relied on slaves relying on their masters. Christian education did teach many slaves to read, but only those whose owners allowed them to attend. Because they needed someone to run errands for them and for other minor reasons, some slave owners would only encourage literacy among their slaves. Slaves were not encouraged to learn how to write. There were numerous reasons why enslaved people wanted to read and write. A literate slave might forge free papers or passes, which could help a slave escape. As a matter of fact, subjugated individuals fashioned free papers so habitually that free blacks with real authoritative records were frequently associated with manufacturing them.
To learn more about slave visit :
https://brainly.com/question/16747534
#SPJ1
Nakota words and PST signs have one-to-one same meaningsa. Nearly always trueb. False one PST sign might have several Nakota words that go with itc. False one Nakota word might have several PST signs that go with itd. both b and ce. False, but for another reason
The correct answer is D - "False, as one PST sign might have several Nakota words that go with it" and "one Nakota word might have several PST signs that go with it."
While Nakota words and PST signs can be used to communicate with each other, it is not a one-to-one correspondence. Some PST signs can have multiple meanings depending on the context, and therefore can be paired with several Nakota words that have different meanings.
Similarly, some Nakota words can have multiple meanings, and therefore can be paired with several PST signs that have different meanings. This makes the communication process more flexible and allows for more nuanced and context-dependent communication.
This question should be provided as:
Nakota words and PST signs have one-to-one same meanings
a. Nearly always trueb. False—one PST sign might have several Nakota words that go with itc. False—one Nakota word might have several PST signs that go with itd. both b and ce. False, but for another reasonLearn more about effective communication https://brainly.com/question/26152499
#SPJ11
PLEASSEEEE HURRY!!!
ILL MARK BRAINLIEST
Read the claim.
Roosevelt’s New Deal led to improvements in America’s drought-relief systems.
Which piece of evidence is relevant to this claim?
A) The Great Depression was partially the result of years of drought.
B) Many farmers worked to conserve water during the Great Depression.
C) The price of land in drought-stricken areas increased during the Great Depression.
D)Many Great Depression–era programs dealing with drought remained in use for decades.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
During the late-1940s and early-1950s, the term McCarthyism was used to mean what? (4 points)investigation of financial transactions to avoid taxesinvestigation of subversion at the highest levels of governmentlegislation that focused on domestic rather than foreign policyaccusation of disloyalty with little or no evidence
During the late-1940s and early-1950s, the term McCarthyism was used to mean "the accusation of disloyalty with little or no evidence."
McCarthyism is a term used to refer to the practice of accusing people of treason or subversion without sufficient evidence. The term originated in the United States during the late 1940s and early 1950s.McCarthyism was a dark period in US history in which many individuals, mostly government officials and intellectuals, were investigated and charged with being communist sympathizers or traitors to their country.
Joseph McCarthy, a US senator from Wisconsin, is often associated with this period of witch hunts and fear-mongering. The accusations were made without proper evidence and often ruined people's careers and reputations. This led to a culture of fear and suspicion in American society, with people being afraid to speak out for fear of being labeled a communist or a traitor.
While McCarthyism eventually fell out of favor, it left a lasting impact on American society. It highlighted the importance of protecting civil liberties and the rule of law, even in times of national security crises. It also demonstrated the danger of political extremism and the need for rational and evidence-based policies.
For more about McCarthyism:
https://brainly.com/question/3283958
#SPJ11
Can some help me with this
Answer: containing the spread of communism
Explanation:
Answer:b
Explanation:
because if you just look it up you will find your answer.
How did Galarza describe life for Mexicans in the U. S. ? Give two examples from the text
Mexicans in the United States have a difficult time adjusting because of prejudice and discrimination, according to Ernesto Galarza.
Here are two instances from the text that demonstrate this:
1) "Because most states' labor laws did not apply to Mexican laborers, they may be paid less than the minimum wage and had no legal protection from their employer. They received no compensation when they were hurt at work."
The difficulties in the economy that Mexican employees in the United States experience are illustrated by this case. Because to the lack of labor regulations protecting them, they were open to exploitation by employers who may pay them less than the minimum wage. Their vulnerability was further increased by the fact that they had no legal options available to them if they were hurt at work.
2) "Mexican Americans frequently experienced harassment and discrimination, and many public places, such as parks, swimming pools, and theatres, were off-limits to them. They were also denied access to many jobs and faced prejudice in housing."
This illustration demonstrates the social and cultural challenges that Mexican Americans in the US confront. They were frequently marginalized and denied access to homes, employment, and public venues. They felt marginalized and excluded from mainstream American society as a result of this discrimination, which made it challenging for them to fully engage and achieve success.
To know more about Ernesto Galarza
brainly.com/question/14149850
#SPJ4
The complete question is:
How did Galarza describe life for Mexicans in the U. S. ? Give two examples from the text(See Picture).
The power of the Federal Government to coin money is what power?
Group of answer choices
expressed powers
concurrent powers
No answer text provided.
implied powers
Create money, regulate its value, establish a standard for weights and measures, and issue foreign coins; In general, the authority to "coin money" and "regulate the value thereof" has been interpreted as authorizing regulation of all aspects of the subject of currency.
What authority does the Federal Government have to mint money?
The United States Congress grants the United States Mint, which is a division of the United States Department of Treasury, authority. Congress approves each coin and most decorations that the U.S. Mint produces and manages the Mint's activities under its Public Endeavor Asset (PEF).
The Bureau of Engraving and Printing makes U.S. currency, and the U.S. Mint makes coins. The two associations are agencies of the U.S. Branch of the Depository.
Currency is produced by the Bureau of Engraving and Printing of the U.S. Treasury. Coins are made by the United States Mint. Through depository institutions, Reserve Banks distribute, receive, and process Fed notes, as well as coin.
Learn more about Federal Government:
https://brainly.com/question/371257
#SPJ1
Write a pitch for one of your favorite TV shows or movie franchises to be filmed in Atlanta, Georgia. Focus on why it would benefit the production company to make the film in Atlanta!
(minimum of three sentences please!!!!)
Remember, a pitch is a brief presentation or proposal used to sell an idea, product, or service.
What are the steps to write a pitch?The following are key steps you can take to write the ideal pitch for one of your favorite TV shows or movie franchises to be filmed in Atlanta, Georgia:
Research about your audience (the production company in this case): Develop your concept: Create a pitch deck (should include a logline, synopsis, character breakdowns, and budget estimates).Write a treatment summary of the story:Craft a compelling oral pitchPractice your pitchFollow up (after pitching, follow up with the production company).By following the steps above, you could create the ideal pitch you need to successfully get one of your favorite TV shows or movie franchises to be filmed in Atlanta, Georgia.
You can learn more about writing a pitch here https://brainly.com/question/27977622
#SPJ1
You've asked an unconcise question. I provided a draft of how you could go about writing your pitch.
3. What can members of opec determine
a. how much oil is imported into the Middle East during a given amount of time
b. how much oil is is exported from OPEC nations during a given amount of time
c. the amount of money nations can invest into the global oil market
d. None of the above
The correct answer is (b) how much oil is exported from OPEC nations during a given amount of time.
OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries) is a group of 14 oil-producing nations that collectively control a significant portion of the world's oil reserves and exports. OPEC members work together to coordinate and regulate the production and export of oil in order to stabilize global oil prices and ensure a steady supply of oil to the world market. Therefore, they can determine how much oil is exported from OPEC nations during a given amount of time.
to learn more about OPEC refer to :
https://brainly.com/question/14305745?referrer=searchResults
!70 points! in three to five sentences explain how relations in the Middle East Led to an oil embargo in the United states in the 1970s
Answer: During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations.
Explanation:
Answer:
Oil Embargo, 1973–1974. During the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, Arab members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) imposed an embargo against the United States in retaliation for the U.S. decision to re-supply the Israeli military and to gain leverage in the post-war peace negotiations.
Explanation: Hope this helps!!! Mark me brainliest!! Have a great spring break.
when conflicts peak between japan and the us, why do you think japan chose to attack hawaii instead of mainland united states
When conflicts peak between Japan and the US, Japan chose to attack Hawaii instead of the mainland United States because of the following reasons:
Distance from Japan: It was easier for Japan to launch an attack on Hawaii since it was relatively close to Japan, as compared to the mainland United States.
Lack of Defenses: Hawaii was also considered a vulnerable target since it was not well-defended by the US army at the time. This made it an easier target for Japan. Attack on mainland US was considered difficult because the US had better military protection compared to Hawaii.
Strategic Value: Pearl Harbor in Hawaii had a strategic value since it was home to the US Navy's Pacific fleet. The Japanese leadership believed that by launching an attack on Pearl Harbor, they would neutralize the US Navy's capability to operate in the Pacific, thereby preventing them from intervening in Japan's expansionist ambitions.The attack on Pearl Harbor in Hawaii was, therefore, a strategic move by Japan to deal a devastating blow to the US Navy and weaken its ability to interfere with Japan's goals of expansion and acquisition of territories in the Pacific region.
To know more about conflicts click on below link :
https://brainly.com/question/17085630#
#SPJ11
protestants who believed one had to be baptized again to join them were the a. puritans. b. anabaptists. c. methodists. d. presbyterians.
Protestants who believed one had to be baptized again to join them were the Anabaptists. Answer.b
What is Anabaptism?
Anabaptism is a Christian reform movement that began in the 16th century as a radical offshoot of the Protestant Reformation. It arose in part due to disagreements among Christians over the significance of baptism in the life of a believer.
Anabaptists emphasized adult baptism, unlike other Protestant groups at the time, and often practiced believer baptism, in which only individuals who confessed their faith in Jesus Christ as their Savior were baptized again.
However, a further schism occurred within the Anabaptist movement, with one group known as Mennonites and another group known as Hutterites. They continue to exist today, and both are recognized as historic peace churches. The correct option is option b. Anabaptists.
To know more about Anabaptists refer here:https://brainly.com/question/28586681#
#SPJ11
Many wars have been fought in the past over ownership and control of land however world war 1 was not fought for this reason. Why did countries around the world send their soldiers into battle at the beginning of the 20th century?
Land ownership and control were not the primary motivations for World War I, which was instead driven by complicated factors including nationalism, militarism, and alliances.
For children, what is World War One?World War I, sometimes known as the Great War, lasted from 1914 to 1918. It was mostly fought in Europe, but it also stretched to the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. It is sometimes referred to as the Great War or the First World War.
What factors led to World War I, according to the essay?In certain European countries in the years preceding World War 1, militarism was the most effective form of force to employ. Militarization had an impact on culture, the media, and public opinion in addition to legislation.
To know more about World War I visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/1449762
#SPJ9
what evidence indicates that the harappan civilization of ancient india had a complete system of government and social organization?.
The evidence that indicates that the Harappan civilization of ancient India had a complete system of government and social organization includes: their extensive and sophisticated irrigation systems, their complex trade routes, their intricate city planning and design, their development of an efficient writing system, and the abundance of artifacts which display elaborate artwork.
1. Irrigation systems: The Harappan people were very advanced when it came to irrigation. They developed large networks of canals, dams, and water channels that helped to bring water to their cities and irrigate their land.
2. Trade routes: The Harappans had a complex network of trading routes that connected them with other civilizations, allowing for the exchange of goods, ideas, and knowledge.
3. City planning and design: The cities of the Harappans were designed with intricate planning. They had well-defined roads, street layouts, and city walls.
4. Writing system: The Harappans developed an efficient writing system that was used for record-keeping and trading purposes.
5. Artifacts: Many artifacts found in Harappan cities display intricate artwork, which indicates that the Harappans had a well-developed system of art and craftsmanship.
To know more about Harappan civilization refer to-
brainly.com/question/6100400#
#SPJ11
T/F Robert Duncan won his state Senate seat in a special election
Answer:
Its True.
Explanation:
He Did win his senate seat in a special election.
in 1936 president roosevelt wanted to create 6 new supreme court justices and 50 new federal judges. this was criticized by many as:
In 1936, President Roosevelt proposed the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill of 1937, also known as the "court-packing" plan, which aimed to add six new justices to the Supreme Court, as well as 50 new federal judges. which faced significant criticism from the political parties.
The proposal was seen as a response to the Supreme Court's opposition to several of Roosevelt's New Deal policies, which the Court had struck down as unconstitutional. Critics argued that Roosevelt's plan to add new judges was an attempt to stack the courts in his favor, allowing him to push through his agenda without opposition from the judiciary.
The proposal was also seen as a violation of the separation of powers between the executive and judicial branches of government. Ultimately, Roosevelt's plan was not successful, as it was met with significant opposition from both political parties, as well as the public.
In 1936 president Roosevelt wanted to create 6 new supreme court justices and 50 new federal judges. By whom this was criticized?
Learn more about President Roosevelt:
https://brainly.com/question/27751393
#SPJ11
Can someone do me the 27 amendements in my own words !
The 27th Amendment prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms for Representatives.
What is the provision of the 27th amendment?The 27th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1992, over 200 years after it was originally proposed by James Madison. The amendment prohibits any law that increases or decreases the salary of members of Congress from taking effect until the start of the next set of terms for Representatives.
The provision was intended to prevent Congress from giving themselves immediate pay raises or cutting their own salaries as a political tactic. It was originally proposed along with other amendments as part of the Bill of Rights in 1789, but was not ratified by enough states at the time. The amendment was revived in the 1980s by a college student who discovered the forgotten provision while researching a term paper.
Read more about 27th amendment
brainly.com/question/12059939
#SPJ1
in what ways and to what extent did the united states government encourage westward migration from 1860 to 1890? apush essay
The US government encouraged westward migration from 1860 to 1890 by offering incentives such as land grants and homesteads, creating new routes of transportation, and improving land access with new canals and railroads.
From 1860 to 1890, the US government enacted various policies and laws to encourage citizens to move westward. The Homestead Act of 1862 granted 160 acres of public land to individuals and families who agreed to live on and cultivate the land for at least five years.
The 1862 Pacific Railroad Act subsidized construction of the first transcontinental railroad, connecting the east and west coasts.
By 1890, the government had granted almost 10 million acres of public land to individuals and businesses. These policies allowed for more citizens to move westward and pursue opportunities in the new frontier.
To know more about Homestead Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/10390487#
#SPJ11
Which event was more important to advancing the position of women in society, the Senate’s passage of the Susan Anthony amendment or Reagan’s proclamation of Women’s History Month? Why? Support your argument using information from both texts.
Susan B. Anthony, a fierce and outspoken supporter of women's rights, requested that Fourteenth Amendment have included a guarantee of the right to vote for both women and African-American men immediately.
Which event was advantageous?First National Woman Suffrage Organization was started in 1869 by Anthony & Elizabeth Cady Stanton. Later same year, it American Woman Suffrage Association was established by Lucy Stones, Julia Ward Howe, and others. The Nineteenth Amendment was not passed into law until 1919, giving women nationwide the right to vote. Women and women's organisations fought for social changes, political and economic equality on a large scale, and the ability to vote in the early 1900s and the late 1800s.
To know more about American Woman Suffrage Association visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1551367
#SPJ1
which part of the nation would have sympathized with the view expressed in the cartoon? the western states like kentucky and tennessee the southern states like georgia, the carolinas, and virginia the northwest territories the new england states of massachusetts, connecticut and rhode island
The cartoon expresses the idea of an unfair political compromise, which would have been sympathized with in the Southern states like Georgia, the Carolinas, and Virginia.
These states had a strong feeling of nationalism, which meant that any compromise that was not to their benefit would be met with opposition.
They would have been opposed to the Compromise of 1850, which allowed California to be a free state, abolished the slave trade in the District of Columbia, and created the Fugitive Slave Act.
The Fugitive Slave Act allowed Southern slave owners to reclaim escaped slaves in any Northern state.
This caused great anger in the South, as it infringed upon their state's rights. They would have sympathized with the sentiment in the cartoon, as they were being unfairly treated.
To know more about Fugitive Slave Act click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/26160636#
#SPJ11
which of the following was not an argument opposing annexation of the philippines? * 1 point the natives could not be christianized. trade could continue without annexation. colonization was anti-american. cheap labor could be imported from the philippines. the filipinos could never become americans.
The argument that the Filipinos could never become Americans was not opposing annexation of the Philippines.
Colonization was seen by some as an anti-American move as it could be argued to be infringing on the independence of the Philippines.
Trade could continue without annexation as the Philippines could remain an independent country. The argument that the natives could not be christianized was also not opposing annexation, as some groups saw this as an opportunity to spread the faith.
The argument of cheap labor was actually an argument in favor of annexation, as some believed it would bring the economic benefits to the US.
To know more about Colonization click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30900919#
#SPJ11